Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vf055h$3rr97$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 06:28:49 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <vf055h$3rr97$2@dont-email.me>
References: <ves6p1$2uoln$1@dont-email.me> <vesemu$2v7sh$1@dont-email.me>
 <a9fb95eb0ed914d0d9775448c005111eb43f2c5b@i2pn2.org>
 <veslpf$34ogr$1@dont-email.me>
 <647fe917c6bc0cfc78083ccf927fe280acdf2f9d@i2pn2.org>
 <vetq7u$3b8r2$1@dont-email.me>
 <d8006439ae02f55ba148e6be1f8c4787905a999f@i2pn2.org>
 <veu30q$3cqfo$1@dont-email.me>
 <0280e32ff3acd1fff59f9637f14bf309150878b4@i2pn2.org>
 <veu4rl$3ct1e$1@dont-email.me>
 <00bf3eb3a01c08467b34e8d7e99ca3fa193aa531@i2pn2.org>
 <veuc3j$3e9cv$1@dont-email.me> <veue7n$1a01$1@news.muc.de>
 <veufr6$3f30f$1@dont-email.me>
 <31fed9bd45277332bcabc040d4b21de642356f63@i2pn2.org>
 <veukur$3ftj1$1@dont-email.me>
 <fa44d9c8febaa7919fbb19dcea581908274b5f32@i2pn2.org>
 <vf033d$3rc0m$3@dont-email.me>
 <2207e01c12262979e430c649025ef03f86b3b9bf@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 13:28:50 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a2f4596ff028e636d7320aa11ac5f85c";
	logging-data="4058407"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+u1D7gn1n8dVvC1KRx9cwa"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7nk1tSP9dv3C0XvjJA1iFlWE1y0=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241019-2, 10/19/2024), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <2207e01c12262979e430c649025ef03f86b3b9bf@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 4419

On 10/19/2024 6:21 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 10/19/24 6:53 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 10/19/2024 2:22 AM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:46:03 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 10/18/2024 4:24 PM, joes wrote:
>>>>> Am Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:18:46 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>> On 10/18/2024 2:51 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>>>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/18/2024 2:10 PM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The existence of the check has an effect right from the start;
>>>>>>>>> besides, it is true the first time it is executed.
>>>>>>>> So maybe you have ADD too. You can't seem to pay attention when
>>>>>>>> things are explained to you many different times several different
>>>>>>>> ways.
>>>>>>> What you call "explaining" is in actual fact the assertion of
>>>>>>> falsehoods.  This is usually called lying.
>>>>>>> The variable Root does indeed affect your program.
>>>>>> *I never say that it didn't*
>>>>> You said nothing at all. Productive communication would have included
>>>>> an agreement and clarification.
>>>>>
>>>>>> The "root" variable has NO EFFECT WHAT-SO-EVER on the correctness or
>>>>>> completeness of HHH emulating itself emulating DDD until this DDD
>>>>>> calls HHH(DDD).
>>>>> DDD does nothing else but call HHH, and Root is part of HHH, so is
>>>>> simulated the first time around.
>>>> It is possible that I am not communicating this clearly enough
>>>> The root variable cannot possibly have have any effect what-so-ever on
>>>> the correctness of HHH emulating DDD or HHH emulating itself emulating
>>>> DDD until the root variable tests true.
>>
>>> It has the effect of not aborting the simulation.
>>
>> It has this effect only after every competent software
>> engineer can independently verify that it is correct:
>>
>> Emulating termination analyzer HHH emulates its input DDD
>> according to the semantics of the x86 language (including HHH
>> emulating itself emulating DDD) until HHH correctly determines
>> that its emulated DDD would never stop running unless aborted.
> 
> Except that the correct determination doesn't happen in the case that 
> Root doesn't affect the behavior of the emulated DDD, so that impurity 
> does have affect.

The root variable has no effect what-so-ever on
the correctness of the emulation up to the point
where everyone can see that HHH is correct to reject DDD.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer