Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vf05tn$3s0s3$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Oscillators in LTspice Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 11:41:43 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 63 Message-ID: <vf05tn$3s0s3$1@dont-email.me> References: <veu2ki$3cmo3$1@dont-email.me> <v255hjtf7jcnlj2h0hm27pkjj3rjj31121@4ax.com> <oi96hjp74reg1krj28mh0n73s0sqm16d94@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 13:41:43 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="52e41224e6bc6a44c1e141f4d23085d5"; logging-data="4064131"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/rPS8w/k64HvqZaM6xHp/y" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7A/y5aStijrykVOaGMD0vK+N1Ug= sha1:9QrC/NOLZ2B4a4A2SEHlkmZ/W7o= Bytes: 3453 boB <boB@K7IQ.com> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 10:08:15 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> > wrote: > >> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:33:22 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom >> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >> >>> Gentlemen, >>> >>> I've never spiced an oscillator AFAICR. Do they self-start in spice >>> simulators (LT in particular)? IOW, did Mike Engleheart build something >>> into the engine which generates wideband 'background' noise, particularly >>> at 'power up' as it were? I'm assuming there must be some such mechanism >>> and if there is, it must be present by default for all schematics one >>> attempts to simulate and not just oscillators? >> >> Oscillators in LT Spice often need to be goosed with an injected pulse >> or some initial condition setting, if they are to start in a tolerable >> time, or at all. >> >> Or skip the initial conditions solution, or bring up the power >> supplies after sim start. >> >> In a multivibrator, some tiny component value tweak can make the >> asymmetry to kick things off. >> >> Actually, the classic astable mv usually has a genuine hangup state, >> both transistors saturated. > > The supply coming up should be enough of a goose to start the > oscillator. > > boB > > > > That’s actually the problem—some circuits with lockup states will work fine on the bench and only fail in the field, due e. g. to wimpier supplies and brownouts. For LC and crystal oscillators, startup problems occur when the small-signal (class A) gain is too low. Circuits with that problem start up fine if the turn-on transient is large and sharp enough, but not otherwise. In a simulation, the very small-scale nonlinearity of rounding error can make the circuit seem to have startup problems that the real circuit doesn’t, sort of like how you can stand an egg on end if you’re careful. (Or sprinkle the bar with salt first, but I digress. ) t’s perfectly legit to goose an oscillator simulation as long as it’s firmly in the small-signal limit, i.e. the goose is << kT/e, so that it’s always class A. Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics