Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Linux 6.11.4
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 19:39:23 +0100
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <vf0ucr$9bs$1@dont-email.me>
References: <lnds37Ffke8U2@mid.individual.net>
 <hb-dnQlimbhpU4z6nZ2dnZfqnPgAAAAA@giganews.com>
 <vetc81$388hc$7@dont-email.me> <vetk2u$39tjl$1@dont-email.me>
 <2eOdndxxY-ogPo_6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <X%xQO.250989$EEm7.97132@fx16.iad> <lngiu8Fs9nrU3@mid.individual.net>
 <DAOQO.237412$1m96.101453@fx15.iad> <lnicjpF61ufU4@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 20:39:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="246fc9cbb3e465f0042c2aa40aa4e7e3";
	logging-data="9596"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19QOubfDZZDTSeTk5Efug/3BjgXbTh8Wo0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FZEgGG3qJYecGSbzuyvCCotmOic=
In-Reply-To: <lnicjpF61ufU4@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2104

On 19/10/2024 19:37, rbowman wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 09:35:31 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
> 
>> Same here, I didn't even realize that the Thunderbird install I had was
>> a Snap. Its performance is no different than what I get with a .deb of
>> the same software. I haven't enabled Flatpak on this install mostly
>> because I don't see the point.
> 
> The Thunderbird on the Ubuntu box isn't a snap. I must have used apt to
> install it. I don't have it on the Fedora or Lubuntu boxes.

Neither on Ubuntu derivatives like Mint

-- 
There is nothing a fleet of dispatchable nuclear power plants cannot do 
that cannot be done worse and more expensively and with higher carbon 
emissions and more adverse environmental impact by adding intermittent 
renewable energy.