Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vf1216$p0c$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: constexpr keyword is unnecessary
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:41:25 -0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <vf1216$p0c$1@dont-email.me>
References: <veb5fi$3ll7j$1@dont-email.me>
 <877ca5q84u.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vf0ijd$3u54q$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf0l98$3un4n$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 21:41:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="08acdff8dec93de51a377425374e1364";
	logging-data="25612"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+uRPc7jjXpIb6j464CeVNo90W/1SstQQQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OqFaitKPI1I3OF+1m9k1SP6GsFw=
In-Reply-To: <vf0l98$3un4n$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2159

Em 10/19/2024 1:03 PM, David Brown escreveu:
> On 19/10/2024 17:18, Thiago Adams wrote:
>> Em 10/18/2024 8:54 PM, Keith Thompson escreveu:
>>> Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> I think constexpr keyword is unnecessary.
>>>
>>> Sure, most language features are strictly unnecessary.
>>>
>>>> Anything you do with it could/should be done with const.
>>>
>>> No, absolutely not.
>>>
>>
>> If not, do you have a sample where, using "const" as "constexpr", 
>> would create problems?
>>
>> The sample I know is VLA.
>>
>> const int c = 2;
>> int a[c]; //a is VLA because c is not a constant expression.
>>
>>
>> But this is not enough to convince me because it is better not to be a 
>> VLA here.
>>
> 
> What practical difference would it make?  

I don't see any practical difference. In theory, the generated code 
could be different, but I'm arguing that this doesn't really matter and, 
consequently, it's not a good reason to differentiate between const and 
constexpr.