Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Attack on Free Software again
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 01:33:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <vf1mkd$444r$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vereq1$br6a$1@matrix.hispagatos.org>
	<vev726$3mg46$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 03:33:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bebb5afd8d6b363c1d85744b8b6ba226";
	logging-data="135323"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19+k1G2Oaj13MLXE1AJI28X"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZcIJfl7vcKOpngodZiqQGHpXu6w=
Bytes: 1419

On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 22:55:02 -0400, Phillip Frabott wrote:

> ... I do think that there are times where
> Richard Stallman keeps certain innovations from happening that I (and a
> few others) think the FSF needs to at the very least consider.

Nothing new there. RMS is a control freak, that’s long been known.

But this is Free Software. Problems like that tend to solve themselves 
(e.g. GCC versus EGCS, GNU Emacs versus XEmacs, Linux libc versus glibc 
etc).