Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Olivier Miakinen <om+news@miakinen.net>
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject: Re: Multiple abuses from i2pn2.
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 11:54:18 +0200
Organization: There's no cabale
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <vf2k0a$3157$1@cabale.usenet-fr.net>
References: <VWH_2ypup_sRKJJJHA6zPHlzZIo@jntp>
 <THdBgjYVdHGiOiCT2OJBvzsquwc@jntp> <vdmocm$3r50e$1@dont-email.me>
 <6701cf05$0$3230$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <vejlco.d7g.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
 <6712c2ce$0$519$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <ahh5hj9e48s5tjnj16f4b1mumtrrmgsaa0@news.usenet.ovh>
 <98a6a638c2928345348c49da3e580895@www.novabbs.org>
 <6713ea01$0$11258$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 200.89.28.93.rev.sfr.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: cabale.usenet-fr.net 1729418058 99495 93.28.89.200 (20 Oct 2024 09:54:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenet-fr.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:54:18 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4
In-Reply-To: <6713ea01$0$11258$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Bytes: 3345

Le 19/10/2024 19:18, Thomas Alexandre a écrit :
> 
> [...] Posting off topic *on a regular basis* is also 
> considered an abuse. It's NOT a matter of opinion, it's just a matter of 
> being on topic.

I completely agree. Indeed, the two users who have now found refuge at i2pn2
do this sort of abuse every day (and even every hour for one of them).

They even obtained a majority of votes for the cancellation of their articles:
<news:umh49a$jtn$1@cabale.usenet-fr.net>
<http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=170675805100>

One(¹) has 9 votes against 4(³) for the cancellation of all his crossposts (with
or without followup-to), but not for the cancellation of all his non-crossposted
articles (only 5 votes against 8).

The other one(²) has 7 votes against 4(³) for the cancellation of all of his
articles.

However, I'm not going to ask i2pn2 to delete their accounts because their
nuisance, although very real on fr.*, doesn't really contravene i2pn2's rules.

> Nobody can claim that those ground rules are free speech related. I'm 
> perfectly aware that Europe and US have very different points of view on 
> this but the fact is : you can express any idea on any group on fr *as long 
> as you are on topic*.

+1

> And the regulations in *my* country (France - that forbid me, by law, to 
> express a few ideas) are **irrelevant** for this matter.

+1

Notes:
=================================================================================
(¹) User 43dv...F05k

(²) User c2iR...bR8k

(³) Note that the 4 votes against the cancellation were from the 4 same people:
 - 1 is the user (¹)
 - 1 is the user (²)
 - 1 is someone who is against *all* cancels on principle, even of clear abuse
 - 1 is someone who likes trolls and has fun with them
=================================================================================

But I repeat, I'm not going to ask i2pn2 to delete their accounts because their
nuisance, although very real on fr.*, doesn't really contravene i2pn2's rules.

-- 
Olivier Miakinen