Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary)
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 10:34:31 -0400
Organization: Peripheral Visions
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <vf34dp$esbp$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org>   <ve683o$6c2o$1@solani.org> <09d9f0df-b1bb-42a7-af9b-890bfbcfc581@att.net> <b0fa9a1c-8375-4523-a15e-65789688660e@tha.de> <3f63bc22-83b2-4d56-9837-849551170c77@att.net> <50ac7044-f8c1-47d9-947f-9fa6044e1848@tha.de> <68b8be64-7fe8-47e7-a991-7adf14713af5@att.net> <vejmkm$e069$1@solani.org> <eb21591a-a60a-4baf-bdbd-afef2a69c230@att.net> <vejte9$e3ds$1@solani.org> <53460f91-4542-4a92-bc4b-833c2ad61e52@att.net> <ventec$255vi$2@dont-email.me> <venunr$2533b$4@dont-email.me> <29ce40e9-f18a-44d4-84d9-23e587cf9dea@att.net> <veor6u$2asus$1@dont-email.me> <2b6f9104-a927-49ee-9cf0-6ee3f82edc23@att.net> <verkkk$2r6kk$1@dont-email.me> <22f95ff7-c361-4d8a-943c-1df76abb98cc@att.net> <vevpsl$3pi3s$2@dont-email.me> <ed1862ff-3679-4175-bb25-c317be9713b2@att.net> <vf0t7i$3v3cv$5@dont-email.me> <9c55eda1-bb24-44ae-9158-2a3b354170cd@att.net> <vf2ck9$amc3$1@dont-email.me> <30b58bd38b2264ae8ca180a544cc88ee34c6d8fa@i2pn2.org> <vf33u8$eisc$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 16:34:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0703cd44d0473c7f6a65a7d1771cecfa";
	logging-data="487801"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18IB8GOtBJ1K9u9xYEVfji/TgeNnzss78c="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LW91GJyXUQh4o21fKpJE4HgP5B0=
X-ICQ: 1701145376
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
Bytes: 2274

WM was thinking very hard :
> On 20.10.2024 13:56, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 10/20/24 3:48 AM, WM wrote:
>
>>> All doubled numbers result in larger numbers. That cannot be avoided.
> �
>> But since there isn't a "largest" number,
>
> There is completeness.

And you have no idea what it means.