Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: oscillator gain
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 18:38:45 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <vf3ink$g5ng$7@dont-email.me>
References: <tue7hjlscute2kmj2tdujsen4dumk65d1r@4ax.com>
	<vf1a39$1su3$4@dont-email.me>
	<1r1pykf.1gs3k3p1sa2cjmN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
	<rq7ahj54a82g6l4d11b9347rn76sidk7d3@4ax.com>
	<1ehahj1js4l5ftindvr1r6m63e2dl379go@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 20:38:45 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ea5aa129740715bbdef0aba0092d4f4d";
	logging-data="530160"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/HtHlmKu0ejlYcUcgiI72AkzJg3/GdIjw="
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WasdceWPn6PUGrP2FGgOY6joM9o=
Bytes: 2824

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 14:06:35 -0400, Joe Gwinn wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 08:23:56 -0700, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
> 
>>On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:06:24 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
>>(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>>
>>>Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 07:05:08 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> > If the loop gain of an oscillator is slightly over 1.00,
>>>> > oscillations gain amplitude. Just under 1.00, they die out.
>>>> > 
>>>> > Economies are like that.
>>>> > 
>>>> > https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/10/19/record-633000-business-
in-
>>>> britain-on-brink-of-collapse-report/
>>>> 
>>>> And the Communists have only been in government for around 2 months.
>>>> It doesn't take long for them to wreck everything!
>>
>>It usually takes a generation to really wreck things, although it has
>>been done a lot faster.
>>
>>
>>>Could Breitbart be biassed in some way ?
>>
>>Most news sources are horribly biased, essentially propaganda.
>>
>>Real Clear at least links to both sides.
>>
>>The New York Times seems to be getting a little bit more journalistic
>>lately. I hope that trend continues.
> 
> The big alternative to the NYT is the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), which
> has been directly criticizing the NYT for their unbalanced coverage, and
> is quite useful for pointing out what has been omitted.  In the old
> days, the NYT would be the check on the WSJ, and so on.

The WSJ has been owned by Rupert Murdoch for a while now IIRC, so it's not 
surprising they're calling out the disgraceful NYT for its biased 
coverage.