Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vf3lek$g5ng$9@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: AF Osc AGC alternatives to lamp/thermistor/FET
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:25:08 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <vf3lek$g5ng$9@dont-email.me>
References: <vf2vp7$e446$1@dont-email.me>
	<4k8ahjdivttskhs7c3nlgtao60irbk5fsi@4ax.com>
	<67154b03$2$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
	<lhjahjta1buqsd34qf6680oruv1m3b3pqe@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 21:25:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ea5aa129740715bbdef0aba0092d4f4d";
	logging-data="530160"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193dodqM5zmiABRC0SEpTfAtSqzPCxCG18="
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ymHa9v68IoClQp84l5PrM/TiXAY=
Bytes: 2954

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 11:42:27 -0700, john larkin wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 14:25:33 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
> 
>>On 10/20/2024 11:38 AM, john larkin wrote:
>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 14:15:19 +0100, piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yesterday in the thread "Random thoughts on sinewave oscillators" I
>>>> posted a LT Spice wirelist showing amplitude levelling without fet,
>>>> ntc thermistor or ptc filament instead using current steering long
>>>> tail pair - kinda poor mans multiplier.
>>>>
>>>> Here is another alternative, using diode conductance bridge
>>>> "variolosser".
>>>>
>>>> For the full 1960s vibe replace U2 U3 with bjt current sources.
>>> 
>>> That's still limiting a Wein bridge, essentially a single-element
>>> resonator.
>>> 
>>> If you do the double-integrator type oscillator, you can do gain
>>> control on the first integrator, and then the second one adds 6
>>> dB/octave harmonic reduction.
>>> 
>>> I think you can even get 12 dB/octave harmonic reduction if you do the
>>> amplitude limiter right. 12*3 = 36!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>There's probably a way to finagle the 4th section of an LM13700 to apply
>>a bias current inversely proportional to the output level into pin IB1,
>>here:
>>
>><https://imgur.com/a/xRVx2PC>
> 
> At some point, opamp distortion and slew rate will usually dominate THD.
> I'd guess that the LM13700 isn't very good.
> 
> It might be OK as the small-influence AGC gain tweak, ahead of two good
> integrating opamps.

At the cost of adding another component, how about adding another opamp 
solely to regulate the output signal level? Say you want 2V p-p output, 
sample some of the output, rectify it and compare it to a reference level 
which is applied to the other opamp input.
Just my 2c.