| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vf3lek$g5ng$9@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: AF Osc AGC alternatives to lamp/thermistor/FET Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:25:08 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 47 Message-ID: <vf3lek$g5ng$9@dont-email.me> References: <vf2vp7$e446$1@dont-email.me> <4k8ahjdivttskhs7c3nlgtao60irbk5fsi@4ax.com> <67154b03$2$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <lhjahjta1buqsd34qf6680oruv1m3b3pqe@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 21:25:09 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ea5aa129740715bbdef0aba0092d4f4d"; logging-data="530160"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193dodqM5zmiABRC0SEpTfAtSqzPCxCG18=" User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ymHa9v68IoClQp84l5PrM/TiXAY= Bytes: 2954 On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 11:42:27 -0700, john larkin wrote: > On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 14:25:33 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: > >>On 10/20/2024 11:38 AM, john larkin wrote: >>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 14:15:19 +0100, piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yesterday in the thread "Random thoughts on sinewave oscillators" I >>>> posted a LT Spice wirelist showing amplitude levelling without fet, >>>> ntc thermistor or ptc filament instead using current steering long >>>> tail pair - kinda poor mans multiplier. >>>> >>>> Here is another alternative, using diode conductance bridge >>>> "variolosser". >>>> >>>> For the full 1960s vibe replace U2 U3 with bjt current sources. >>> >>> That's still limiting a Wein bridge, essentially a single-element >>> resonator. >>> >>> If you do the double-integrator type oscillator, you can do gain >>> control on the first integrator, and then the second one adds 6 >>> dB/octave harmonic reduction. >>> >>> I think you can even get 12 dB/octave harmonic reduction if you do the >>> amplitude limiter right. 12*3 = 36! >>> >>> >>> >>There's probably a way to finagle the 4th section of an LM13700 to apply >>a bias current inversely proportional to the output level into pin IB1, >>here: >> >><https://imgur.com/a/xRVx2PC> > > At some point, opamp distortion and slew rate will usually dominate THD. > I'd guess that the LM13700 isn't very good. > > It might be OK as the small-influence AGC gain tweak, ahead of two good > integrating opamps. At the cost of adding another component, how about adding another opamp solely to regulate the output signal level? Say you want 2V p-p output, sample some of the output, rectify it and compare it to a reference level which is applied to the other opamp input. Just my 2c.