Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vf53j8$shot$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: ChatGPT 4.0 keeps refuting every rebuttal of my work --- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:32:40 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 23 Message-ID: <vf53j8$shot$1@dont-email.me> References: <vf49jc$k9ig$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:32:40 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c56cb3d89d45ed7901e7fd7a6b935be0"; logging-data="935709"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++23ys1JrOK/jOsOkUL6pG" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:i3ILYIlTyrskJ0jFnXLuObp1xxM= Bytes: 1696 On 2024-10-21 01:09:00 +0000, olcott said: > This is the recent dialogue that has been discussed > for a few days with exactly one more question added: > > Could it be correct for HHH(DDD) to report on the > behavior of the directly executed DDD()? > > https://chatgpt.com/share/67158ec6-3398-8011-98d1-41198baa29f2 > The first less than one page is the entire basis that > ChatGPT 4.0 uses to evaluate my work. From the linked page: "This conversation may reflect the link creator’s personalized data, which isn’t shared and can meaningfully change how the model responds." ChatGPT is not an authority on anything. If you can't make present your argument then you can't argue. Opinions of an artificial idiot are not interesting. -- Mikko