Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vf53j8$shot$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: ChatGPT 4.0 keeps refuting every rebuttal of my work ---
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:32:40 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <vf53j8$shot$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vf49jc$k9ig$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:32:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c56cb3d89d45ed7901e7fd7a6b935be0";
	logging-data="935709"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++23ys1JrOK/jOsOkUL6pG"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:i3ILYIlTyrskJ0jFnXLuObp1xxM=
Bytes: 1696

On 2024-10-21 01:09:00 +0000, olcott said:

> This is the recent dialogue that has been discussed
> for a few days with exactly one more question added:
> 
> Could it be correct for HHH(DDD) to report on the
> behavior of the directly executed DDD()?
> 
> https://chatgpt.com/share/67158ec6-3398-8011-98d1-41198baa29f2
> The first less than one page is the entire basis that
> ChatGPT 4.0 uses to evaluate my work.

From the linked page: "This conversation may reflect the
link creator’s personalized data, which isn’t shared and
can meaningfully change how the model responds."

ChatGPT is not an authority on anything. If you can't make present
your argument then you can't argue. Opinions of an artificial idiot
are not interesting.

-- 
Mikko