Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Yet Another Self-Burn from the Harris-Walz Ticket
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 05:41:23 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <vf7du3$1c1ej$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vf3cv3$g8jk$3@dont-email.me> <vf6ab0$12ek0$6@dont-email.me> <vf6gva$13faf$4@dont-email.me> <vf6khj$147f6$3@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 07:41:23 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9e0440ca9deca081ed9b442d2221f9f7";
	logging-data="1443283"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9rTSlGEHDur6AqFNPd1Swx7zfgZKDFmc="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YPmbS0TWwlcD5LGurVm/m3rPguA=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 3059

BTR1701  <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>On Oct 21, 2024 at 2:27:06 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/21/2024 3:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>  On Oct 21, 2024 at 10:56:51 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>  
>>>>  On 10/21/2024 1:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>    On Oct 20, 2024 at 10:30:06 PM PDT, "super70s"
><super70s@super70s.invalid>
>>>>>    wrote:
>>>>>    
>>>>>>    On 2024-10-20 17:00:19 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>      "We can't afford four more years of this!" --Tim Walz, Green Bay,
>>>>>>> WI rally
>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>      Either the dude is literally dunking on his own running mate or
>>>>>>> he's come
>>>>>>>    over
>>>>>>>      to Trump's side and now believes Trump won the 2020 election.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    He's obviously talking about 4 more years of Trump.
>>>>>    
>>>>>    But Trump isn't in office, so he can't be "this".
>>>> 
>>>>  Depending on the (missing!) context, of course he can...
>>>  
>>>  No, he can't. He's not in office.
>> 
>> But we don't *know* that Walz's "this" isn't referring to, say, Trump's 
>> increasingly manifest dementia.  Hint: 3-second videos reliably lie.
>> 
>> 
>>>>>>    Obvious to halfway intelligent and informed people anyway.
>>>>>    
>>>>>    Hardly. Kammie has been running as if she's challenging an
>incumbent since
>>>>>  she
>>>>>    was coronated.
>>>> 
>>>>  She's running against a known precedent/president.
>>>  
>>>  And yet she and her campaign keep saying she's the "candidate for change".
>>>  Change from what? Who's currently in office? This is the first time in
>>>  American history that an incumbent quixotically keeps beating the drum for
>>>  'change', which would logically imply that she's advocating voters to choose
>>>  her opponent rather than her.
>> 
>> She's multi-ethnic, female, and under 60.  Change is guaranteed.
>
>Ah, identity politics! Always a great basis on which to cast a vote. Maybe
>she's left-handed, too!

moviePig got it wrong. She was born October 20, 1964.