Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: constexpr keyword is unnecessary
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:48:11 -0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <vf86uc$1fvt3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <veb5fi$3ll7j$1@dont-email.me>
 <877ca5q84u.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vf0ijd$3u54q$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf0l98$3un4n$1@dont-email.me> <vf1216$p0c$1@dont-email.me>
 <87y12jpxvl.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vf1d2o$2hjk$1@dont-email.me>
 <87plnvpgb9.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vf2sm8$deou$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf7m4s$1d8mj$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:48:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="99417925cb3e1ec44b3fc056573e6074";
	logging-data="1572771"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+JXrblOxEk3aMfxEYvbTy6Kj4iSBL4J8A="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sODt52QKh4RS7DTcesqm3Gi0oJs=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vf7m4s$1d8mj$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
Bytes: 1937

On 22/10/2024 05:02, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 20.10.2024 um 14:22 schrieb Thiago Adams:
> 
>> //'constexpr' initializer not representable in type of object
>> constexpr unsigned char c= 1234;
>> with const it is a warning. ...
> 
> Good that we have constexpr now.
> 


I think a more generic feature would be to have a standard way of 
promoting selected warnings to errors. This would avoid stacking 
features with small differences, such as treating constexpr as a special 
case compared to other constant expressions in C.