| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vf8cs5$1h271$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Subject: Re: Finally long term stable high density storage Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 07:29:26 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 68 Message-ID: <vf8cs5$1h271$1@dont-email.me> References: <4f9c24f2e351024177ca1491c6ddf3c06a435754@i2pn2.org> <70cahj10nfeksb9p03e63rbkur8av4ioui@4ax.com> <vf3cf3$gdc3$1@dont-email.me> <pan$bc1b6$470fef06$673722a5$61f5ef20@cultnix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:29:25 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3370c7ed1d0361359c2a347a884be0c6"; logging-data="1607905"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+00k6MsFxhWYu26W+2/oP9" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:42q0A9GFK1vLDw8hgfNfyotkkzo= In-Reply-To: <pan$bc1b6$470fef06$673722a5$61f5ef20@cultnix.org> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3913 On 10/21/2024 11:00 PM, vallor wrote: > On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:51:49 -0700, Dimensional Traveler wrote: > >> On 10/20/2024 9:41 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote: >>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 08:48:16 -0700, Justisaur <justisaur@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> 360 TB 1+ B years >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5D_optical_data_storage >>> >>> The tech has been around... well, Wiki says it was first demonstrated >>> in '96. "Finally" is a bit of a misnomer. ;-) >>> >>> IIRC, though, it has several downsides. Biggest is that it is extremely >>> slow with writes (and pretty slow with reads too). And even if it had >>> "HDD-speed" read/writes... well, back-of-the-napkin math indicates it >>> would still take close to 3 DAYS to read all that data (about half that >>> if it were SSD speed). We'd need advancement in the IO first to really >>> make use of drives that big. >>> >>> It's also write-once, which limits its use to archival. So it's not >>> gonna replace HDDs or SDDs any time soon. >>> >>> >>>> Now Spalls can fit all his games on one disk about the size of a >>>> quarter and not worry it's going to die of bit rot. >>> >>> I've over the years transferred pretty much all of my DOS-era games to >>> HDD (twice actually; first as images of the original medium, and then a >>> second time to a different HDD where the games are actually installed). >>> The installed games takes significantly less than a single terabyte, >>> and that collection includes probably every DOS game you've ever heard >>> of (and a few more too ;-) >>> >>> Disk-space is so cheap and readily available already that -while I >>> wouldn't sneeze at a long-term archival medium- it's not really >>> necessary. It's surprisingly hard to fill up multi-terabyte sized disks >>> under ordinary usage ;-) >>> >> "Hold my beer." ;) > > $ df -h -t nfs4 > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > 192.168.23.12:/volume1/ds 39T 26T 13T 68% /nfs/ds > 192.168.23.12:/volume1/music 39T 26T 13T 68% /nfs/music > > Space is getting a little worrisome, but I have a new Synology filer > sitting in its box, as well as drives. Just haven't gotten a round tuit. > > Most of /nfs/ds is backups of my workstations throughout the years. > My music collection is flac ripped from CD's, which I often lose track > of... > > However, there is this: > > _[/nfs/ds/scott/src/OS]_(scott@lm)🐧_ > $ du -hs > 853G . > > 850G of built Linux kernels. (I'm a digital hoarder, > and having an NAS hasn't helped.) > *gives vallor his beer back* :D -- I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.