| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vf976u$1ln5b$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= <arne@vajhoej.dk> Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: VI* on VMS Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:58:54 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: <vf976u$1ln5b$2@dont-email.me> References: <87zfn4p2ul.fsf@lucy.meyer21c.net> <vep4bs$2cblv$1@dont-email.me> <vep554$26n$1@reader1.panix.com> <vep5j4$2cbm0$1@dont-email.me> <vep5m3$hal$1@reader1.panix.com> <67101c74$0$716$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <vepeji$274a1$1@dont-email.me> <ver0dk$2ohfg$1@dont-email.me> <ver1c8$2ns6d$2@dont-email.me> <671109ba$0$709$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <vetj5j$39s7n$1@dont-email.me> <vetle4$38vcj$3@dont-email.me> <671261f3$0$708$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <67129f26$0$708$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <67130094$0$712$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <vf5gju$uet0$1@dont-email.me> <vf699g$12frp$1@dont-email.me> <vf85bu$1fmtb$1@dont-email.me> <vf85jg$1ffc5$1@dont-email.me> <vf85rp$1f2pb$1@dont-email.me> <67179bd4$0$709$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <vf87bb$1f2pb$2@dont-email.me> <vf87ti$1ffc5$2@dont-email.me> <vf888f$1g7pg$1@dont-email.me> <vf89dh$1ffc5$3@dont-email.me> <vf92ps$1l20u$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 23:58:55 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1a84707ca2c44d87978460534426b3f8"; logging-data="1760427"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ys75NWj8X3RUAuHzPWzTBcHxZAiIKeco=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:0/+2XrOg1cMftcqdy8L0maUXs6E= In-Reply-To: <vf92ps$1l20u$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2271 On 10/22/2024 4:43 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:30:25 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> But it does use DESCRIP.MMS files and not MAKEFILE. files. > > Is there a port of CMake to VMS? I don't think so. Even though I believe it has been looked into before. > That’s not the latest hawtness, but I imagine it would still be a step > forward. Feel free to start porting. Arne