Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: VI* on VMS
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:06:13 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vf9i65$1ngbi$1@dont-email.me>
References: <87zfn4p2ul.fsf@lucy.meyer21c.net> <vep4bs$2cblv$1@dont-email.me>
 <vep554$26n$1@reader1.panix.com> <vep5j4$2cbm0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vep5m3$hal$1@reader1.panix.com> <67101c74$0$716$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <vepeji$274a1$1@dont-email.me> <ver0dk$2ohfg$1@dont-email.me>
 <ver1c8$2ns6d$2@dont-email.me> <671109ba$0$709$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <vetj5j$39s7n$1@dont-email.me> <vetle4$38vcj$3@dont-email.me>
 <671261f3$0$708$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <67129f26$0$708$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <67130094$0$712$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <vf5gju$uet0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf699g$12frp$1@dont-email.me> <vf85bu$1fmtb$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf85jg$1ffc5$1@dont-email.me> <vf92mg$1l20u$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf96uo$1ln5b$1@dont-email.me> <vf97k8$1lsqn$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 03:06:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="47883bab3921f057e1286c4cd7c7c0ab";
	logging-data="1818994"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+LNqP/uEkDzmVyb6cDgbkPtkMizm8IYG8="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gT4wg6S6/ZjeLoSGd1GsQ+A8Ds8=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vf97k8$1lsqn$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2464

On 10/22/2024 6:06 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:54:32 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> 
>> On 10/22/2024 4:41 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:25:20 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, the "right" solution would be to add a:
>>>>>
>>>>> 	on_key_press(whatever...)
>>>>>
>>>>> handler. :-)
>>>>
>>>> True. But only VSI can do that.
>>>
>>> What, no custom key bindings in TPU?
>>
>> It has. But the above is not a key binding.
> 
> You want some kind of additional hook on every keypress?

That was what is needed to do a check every time
position is changed without modifying all the position
moving procedures and without the dirty 0.1 sec AST.

Arne