Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vfbnb7$rab4$3@solani.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: How Monkeys see the World (Re: What is it like to be a Bat?)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:46:31 +0200
Message-ID: <vfbnb7$rab4$3@solani.org>
References: <v3ndqb$1782o$1@solani.org> <vfbmre$r9vv$3@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 20:46:31 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="895332"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:K44Ha5kWLh+lFU2e3W7w59WUGSo=
In-Reply-To: <vfbmre$r9vv$3@solani.org>
X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXVGiBc6iO/09YAuPmDSfoGMwh2RiRR2FzKuIz3M365uYyj1dseeCobfGV0lLT0poc/EBIFXo=
Bytes: 3402
Lines: 77

Hi,

One could now assume that this dualism
prevents artificial intelligence.  Because
seeing “pink” leads to feeling “pink”.
In this respect, this is also a very

interesting book, perhaps of historical interest?

How Monkeys See the World
”A fascinating intellectual odyssey and a
superb summary of where science stands.”
https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo3774491.html

My guess ChatGPT proves that dualism does
not prevent artificial intelligence.  And
how does ChatGPT manage it?

I suspect the Knowlegde Acquisition
Bottleneck has been cracked.  Even though
ChatGPT doesn't have a "Pink" feeling,

it still has the semantic network of "Pink"
and can have a say.  It was already heard through
the grapevine in 2018 that something was being

done, but back then it was a rather skeptical vote:

Did We Just Replace the ‘Knowledge Bottleneck’
With a ‘Data Bottleneck’?
https://cacm.acm.org/blogcacm/did-we-just-replace-the-knowledge-bottleneck-with-a-data-bottleneck/

The "Too good to be true, in fact." turned into
a "Heureka, it works!" right before our eyes.
The date of birth was:

Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3)
OpenAI - 28. Mai 2020, Wired reported that
GPT-3 "sends shivers down spines in Silicon Valley."
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_Pre-trained_Transformer_3#Rezeption

Have Fun!

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> So this study colleague with his Flavia, the female
> mathematician, has given me something to think about.
> Why don't I react exactly the same as him?
> 
> Maybe he's a different strain of homosapiens?
> And therefore rules differently than me, at least
> I never had a fetish for female mathematicians,
> 
> a contradiction to determinism?
> Ha ha, now I can feed you something again:
> 
> What is it Like to be a Bat?
> the hard problem of consciousness
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaZbCctlll4
> 
> Bye
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Just reading:
>>
>> "Deep ecologists reject any mechanical
>> or computer model of nature, and see
>> the Earth as a living organism, which
>> should be treated and understood accordingly"
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecology#Sources
>>
>> Now that we enter the age of AI. What
>> about an AI Computer model. An AI Earth
>> Computer model? Any pointers?
>>
>