Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wmartin <wwm@wwmartin.net>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Ultrasonic cleaners
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:58:33 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <vfbv5j$2a43b$1@dont-email.me>
References: <66f4d3b5$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 01:00:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="037bca01d0493049ac332ccc6d2d60fc";
	logging-data="2429035"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+OOHDxmio5OssfXeV0CPnb4bD7AcTbs9U="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9Y+DQ4i/snvdHtMcUMzKnEV2Edo=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <66f4d3b5$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Bytes: 1687

On 9/25/24 20:24, bitrex wrote:
> Any serious gotchas/unobtainium parts with respect to repairing these 
> 1980s/90s(?) Branson ultrasonic cleaners?
> 
> <https://d2b3o1qijggx1c.cloudfront.net/full-version-images/1200-Ultrasonic-Cleaner_0.JPG>
> 
> I'd like one to have around for cleaning parts in the lab but 
> good-quality ones tend to be more than I want to spend; I probably won't 
> use it that often, I can get a 1200 series that doesn't seem to 
> ultrasound for a few bucks though.
> 
> 
Branson stuff of that era is/was top quality laboratory-grade hardware, 
you can probably find a repair shop to snag replacement transducers, 
should they be bad.