Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who Victory of the Daleks
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 23:53:38 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <vfdg0i$2krg5$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vfb2jv$e0d$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <xn0oses6s87gwd002@post.eweka.nl>
 <vfb46r$80g$3@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vfd4ot$2j5bn$3@dont-email.me>
 <vfd98a$2qm5$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:53:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a7851fbc442301d810eae1feca0828b7";
	logging-data="2780677"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/aq4QOsKe4lKBYW3xPiN6Mp8lPwUzbP4U="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vae5dZNtLBKTZETVO+RhnI9VsRA=
In-Reply-To: <vfd98a$2qm5$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2670

The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 9:58 pm:
> In article <vfd4ot$2j5bn$3@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 24/10/24 2:19 am:
>>> In article <xn0oses6s87gwd002@post.eweka.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In "Victory of the Daleks", the Doctor faces his old enemies
>>>>> in WWII-era London. The Daleks are disguised as British war
>>>>> machines, manipulating Winston Churchill's forces. The story
>>>>> introduces a new, colorful Dalek paradigm, but the plot is
>>>>> thin and rushed. The pacing feels uneven, with a swift
>>>>> transition from war intrigue to sci-fi action.
>>>>>
>>>>> While the historical setting and Daleks' reintroduction are
>>>>> entertaining, the execution falls short. Overall, it's an
>>>>> enjoyable but flawed episode.  I'd give it a 6/10, mostly for
>>>>> nostalgic value and visuals.
>>>>
>>>> What sort of a review is that? There's no mention of Spitfires
>>>> in space, but the humpback Daleks get a mention. <shrugs>
>>>>
>>>> And we won't even mention the trains in the sky!
>>>>
>>>> Ooops, too late. Sorry Daniel...
>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Rant on!  Hence why AI is what DAnnyboy says it is!
>>>
>> Oh!! And what do I say 'AI' is, Gobble-de-gook??
> 
> You know!
> 
If *I* knew what *I* had said (in this instance), why would *I* have to 
ask YOU, Gobble-de-gook??
-- 
Daniel