Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: 2N=E
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:24:20 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vfdlal$2l6kj$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vf3ldc$hgts$2@dont-email.me>
 <8418a2e3-bba2-43b4-8c77-3e947a270476@att.net> <vf3n5v$i1ai$2@dont-email.me>
 <vf3r29$ipdp$1@dont-email.me> <vf52gf$sc1t$2@dont-email.me>
 <d854b742bc974c19b0106fa51222bbb640e2d92d@i2pn2.org>
 <b2090fd4-8329-4c3c-9698-a1e7697040b1@tha.de>
 <6c56b6df33cedd35cac468735501d2d89ad19048@i2pn2.org>
 <vf66uf$128bg$1@dont-email.me>
 <9e98e573c0368690d336299ab78121c3240aa8e7@i2pn2.org>
 <vf8bqn$1gqlu$1@dont-email.me>
 <6310990a57ee5388e4e3a2c280fde00fc1b142ae@i2pn2.org>
 <vf8nre$1ivt6$3@dont-email.me> <vf8r1h$1jnia$1@dont-email.me>
 <3834533883e5a9dbc8546bf3eb425f762f2d0ab3@i2pn2.org>
 <vf9202$1kubs$1@dont-email.me>
 <c2b705b5e27f7c171e819d13313f11983c052506@i2pn2.org>
 <vfbdq4$251r2$1@dont-email.me>
 <6c929080fc639ef2e26217ccd2908b1face54361@i2pn2.org>
 <vfd8hd$2ire9$1@dont-email.me>
 <272433824a6757890727cb76203777dda01dcf1e@i2pn2.org>
 <vfdj9s$2l9bh$2@dont-email.me>
 <b415bcc470029bd4814b226ea14a6a7753125dfd@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:24:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0dd894fffc8f685f2cae0823449da2ef";
	logging-data="2792083"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/IpGvYyk27aLIur4jZYB4Ea8k5jSuIjes="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ui5fsUJP5i3mNeKjt99ki8DhkG0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <b415bcc470029bd4814b226ea14a6a7753125dfd@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 2941

On 24.10.2024 15:59, joes wrote:
> Am Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:49:48 +0200 schrieb WM:

>> The possibility of always even greater ones in natural numbers proves
>> potential infinity.
> You have it backwards. Surely the "complete" set should not be missing
> those greater numbers that the "potential" set includes.

The potentially infinite set does not include them. Then they would be 
doubled too.
> 
>> The greater ones have not been doubled because doubling of a complete
>> set creates a set covering a greater interval than covered before. (Half
>> the density implies twice the extension.)
> They have also been doubled, along with their doubles. The powers of 2 and
> their multiples form a subset of the naturals. The "size" of this set
> is omega, and 2w=w, regardless of "reality".

The complete set covers an interval. When its density is reduced its 
extension is increased.

Regards, WM


Regards, WM
>