Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vfdoik$2m48t$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a
 Smear
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 08:19:49 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <vfdoik$2m48t$2@dont-email.me>
References: <20240913a@crcomp.net> <vf6026$10842$1@dont-email.me>
 <8ehfhj9jphf08ssafje6l45ugf8dd4gjub@4ax.com> <lmQRO.69417$MxR.12614@fx47.iad>
 <vfaq8c$po2$1@panix2.panix.com> <vfb3q0$22v2c$2@dont-email.me>
 <vfcbia$2fcu9$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:19:48 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c2c4d15898459caabfa9273f9cc1772f";
	logging-data="2822429"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18xLJn9vY8sR1/KdXivIKei"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/cu5eVeeZwF/P1xwGzOh0TIu7OU=
In-Reply-To: <vfcbia$2fcu9$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3971

On 10/23/2024 7:31 PM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
> On 10/23/2024 11:13 AM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
>> On 10/23/2024 5:30 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
>>> Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>> <about LA smog>
>>>> Having lived there, I can confirm that it is far better than
>>>> the 70s and 80s.   I recall playing softball one saturday
>>>> in 1985 and having to stop between home and first to catch
>>>> my breath.
>>>
>>> And this is in great part due to government regulation of auto 
>>> manufacturers,
>>> first in California but then across the US.  Car manufacturers fought 
>>> the
>>> emission control requirements tooth and nail, and most of the early 
>>> attempts
>>> they made to meet them were incredibly poor and reduced both 
>>> performance and
>>> reliability.  Eventually they were driven toward closed-loop fuel 
>>> injection
>>> control and then the world changed for the better in so many 
>>> different ways.
>>>
>>> Eventually the emission control requirements wound up resulting in a 
>>> better
>>> technology with higher performance and better reliability as well as 
>>> a lot
>>> less smog.
>>>
>>>> On the other hand, it's worse now that it was a decade
>>>> ago, simply due to population growth over the last
>>>> couple decades (and wildfires).
>>>
>>> Electric vehicles still pollute, it's just that the pollution is done 
>>> at the
>>> power plant many miles away where it isn't visible.  BUT, electric 
>>> vehicles
>>> only use pollution-causing power when they are running, not when they 
>>> are
>>> immobilized in traffic on the 101.  Cars in LA seem to spend as much 
>>> time
>>> stopped as moving, and so electric power is likely to be a win.
>>> --scott
>>>
>> But those same batteries have to power the AC which in LA means a lot 
>> of "out of juice" EVs on the highway to add to the "stop" part of 
>> "stop and go traffic"!  :P
> 
> How many have you actually seen? The batteries in pure EVs are so large
> compared to ICE cars, and the consumption running the heat pump so low
> in comparison to that of moving the car, that the AC and heat can run
> for a long, long time.
> 
> I once tested my car in single digit temperatures, and determined that
> the interior could be kept at 60F+ for well over a day.
> 
> A few hours in stop-and-go with the AC on is easily obtained.
> 
> OTOH, I do frequently hear of ICE cars draining their small batteries
> running the AC in the same conditions.
> 
I think you missed the ":p" tongue-in-cheek emoji at the end of my post.  ;)

-- 
I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky 
dirty old man.