| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vfdoik$2m48t$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 08:19:49 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 66 Message-ID: <vfdoik$2m48t$2@dont-email.me> References: <20240913a@crcomp.net> <vf6026$10842$1@dont-email.me> <8ehfhj9jphf08ssafje6l45ugf8dd4gjub@4ax.com> <lmQRO.69417$MxR.12614@fx47.iad> <vfaq8c$po2$1@panix2.panix.com> <vfb3q0$22v2c$2@dont-email.me> <vfcbia$2fcu9$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:19:48 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c2c4d15898459caabfa9273f9cc1772f"; logging-data="2822429"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18xLJn9vY8sR1/KdXivIKei" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:/cu5eVeeZwF/P1xwGzOh0TIu7OU= In-Reply-To: <vfcbia$2fcu9$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3971 On 10/23/2024 7:31 PM, Cryptoengineer wrote: > On 10/23/2024 11:13 AM, Dimensional Traveler wrote: >> On 10/23/2024 5:30 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote: >>> Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote: >>> <about LA smog> >>>> Having lived there, I can confirm that it is far better than >>>> the 70s and 80s. I recall playing softball one saturday >>>> in 1985 and having to stop between home and first to catch >>>> my breath. >>> >>> And this is in great part due to government regulation of auto >>> manufacturers, >>> first in California but then across the US. Car manufacturers fought >>> the >>> emission control requirements tooth and nail, and most of the early >>> attempts >>> they made to meet them were incredibly poor and reduced both >>> performance and >>> reliability. Eventually they were driven toward closed-loop fuel >>> injection >>> control and then the world changed for the better in so many >>> different ways. >>> >>> Eventually the emission control requirements wound up resulting in a >>> better >>> technology with higher performance and better reliability as well as >>> a lot >>> less smog. >>> >>>> On the other hand, it's worse now that it was a decade >>>> ago, simply due to population growth over the last >>>> couple decades (and wildfires). >>> >>> Electric vehicles still pollute, it's just that the pollution is done >>> at the >>> power plant many miles away where it isn't visible. BUT, electric >>> vehicles >>> only use pollution-causing power when they are running, not when they >>> are >>> immobilized in traffic on the 101. Cars in LA seem to spend as much >>> time >>> stopped as moving, and so electric power is likely to be a win. >>> --scott >>> >> But those same batteries have to power the AC which in LA means a lot >> of "out of juice" EVs on the highway to add to the "stop" part of >> "stop and go traffic"! :P > > How many have you actually seen? The batteries in pure EVs are so large > compared to ICE cars, and the consumption running the heat pump so low > in comparison to that of moving the car, that the AC and heat can run > for a long, long time. > > I once tested my car in single digit temperatures, and determined that > the interior could be kept at 60F+ for well over a day. > > A few hours in stop-and-go with the AC on is easily obtained. > > OTOH, I do frequently hear of ICE cars draining their small batteries > running the AC in the same conditions. > I think you missed the ":p" tongue-in-cheek emoji at the end of my post. ;) -- I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.