Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vfiem5$3m055$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 11:01:41 +0100 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 35 Message-ID: <vfiem5$3m055$1@dont-email.me> References: <pan$26699$6602b79b$4abe425a$df32a923@gnu.rocks> <_OmcnZpYmdE-PYX6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> <wwvldyfmenf.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <vfcjir$2gc7o$4@dont-email.me> <wwvv7xh1jee.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <vfeh5a$2qk0v$1@dont-email.me> <slrnvhnn9i.2ou1.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <vfh570$3brp2$2@dont-email.me> <20241025153958.0000222f@gmail.com> <vfhbt5$3d372$2@dont-email.me> <vfhkm0$3i0mb$1@dont-email.me> <lo3dvqFo19fU2@mid.individual.net> <vfi017$3jf3g$4@dont-email.me> <aq6dnU74jY9CDoH6nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@earthlink.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 12:01:49 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7ba0119f591c2bdcccf4b1cbfa9307f0"; logging-data="3866789"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19foqiCCggSZ7UYKxtbDQO4a1wc6cOSSFM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:FbDfMORM0fyvqqqfg0pjHYgvm94= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <aq6dnU74jY9CDoH6nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@earthlink.com> Bytes: 2703 On 26/10/2024 08:01, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 10/26/24 1:51 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> On 26 Oct 2024 05:45:31 GMT, rbowman wrote: >> >>> About the time Heidegger asked 'Why are there beings at all rather than >>> nothing?' in 'Introduction to Metaphysics' my head started to hurt. That >>> was sentence 1, chapter 1. It didn't get better from there on. >> >> Did he mention the Anthropic Principle at all? >> >> That’s a controversial one. Fred Hoyle used it to predict the >> existence of >> an energetic state of the carbon atom without which heavier elements >> could >> not be synthesized. > > > All philosophy is bullshit - including this philosophy :-) > > That is the reaction of 99% of those who are exposed to it. But it isn't. It has tools enabling you to think in extremely different ways. The problem is most people think it purports to reveal Truth, but it doesn't. It is however and interesting study of Lies. -- The lifetime of any political organisation is about three years before its been subverted by the people it tried to warn you about. Anon.