Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: constexpr keyword is unnecessary
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 15:07:05 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <vfit29$3obkb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <veb5fi$3ll7j$1@dont-email.me>
 <877ca5q84u.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vf0ijd$3u54q$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf0l98$3un4n$1@dont-email.me> <vf1216$p0c$1@dont-email.me>
 <87y12jpxvl.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vf1d2o$2hjk$1@dont-email.me>
 <87plnvpgb9.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vf2sm8$deou$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf7m4s$1d8mj$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vf86uc$1fvt3$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:07:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1a34abd57199070a12913a6a127db11a";
	logging-data="3944075"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+/o1vgbOEF+xXdRbYk7TZpUKdtoMH9p9A="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lo90YW6+3/zbsmGLGMOGIHEIxCU=
In-Reply-To: <vf86uc$1fvt3$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 1940

On 22/10/2024 13:48, Thiago Adams wrote:
> 
> I think a more generic feature would be to have a standard way of 
> promoting selected warnings to errors. This would avoid stacking 
> features with small differences, such as treating constexpr as a special 
> case compared to other constant expressions in C.

I have in the past had coding standards that require you to fix all 
warnings. After all, sometimes they do matter.

IIRC we had a compiler that had a "treat warnings as errors" parameter.

Andy