Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!Iskon!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mario Petrinovic <mario.petrinovic1@zg.htnet.hr>
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Subject: Re: Humans - "bipedal animals"?
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 01:59:05 +0200
Organization: Iskon Internet d.d.
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <vfjvo9$9ba$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
References: <veieuq$n3p$1@sunce.iskon.hr> <vfjru3$bpc$1@ereborbbs.duckdns.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83-131-248-20.adsl.net.t-com.hr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: sunce.iskon.hr 1729987145 9578 83.131.248.20 (26 Oct 2024 23:59:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@iskon.hr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 23:59:05 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vfjru3$bpc$1@ereborbbs.duckdns.org>
Bytes: 1604

On 27.10.2024. 0:53, Kyonshi wrote:
> On 10/14/2024 8:50 AM, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
>>          Are we really that much more bipedal than other animals? No, 
>> we aren't. What distinguishes us from others is that we *cannot* be 
>> quadrupedal, this is our characteristic, we cannot be quadrupedal.
>> https://youtube.com/shorts/NLk9neGyheM?si=DzVuMfP8D7igswHB
>>          Did we become "bipedal" so that we can look over the grass? 
>> No, this doesn't make you "bipedal":
>> https://youtube.com/shorts/qiXw5_JD59g?si=97nQkAepJh3iac5S
> 
> kangaroos are also bipedal

		Yes. And they don't have different pelvis or the s-curve.