Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: Is there a way in Fortran to designate an integer value as
 integer*8 ?
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 08:05:47 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vfks8r$6vrt$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vdict2$339ak$1@dont-email.me> <vdir24$35104$1@dont-email.me>
 <vdk718$3bulb$1@dont-email.me> <vdl6fi$3jra3$2@dont-email.me>
 <vdlfpl$3l0f5$1@dont-email.me> <vdmbml$3p2dv$1@dont-email.me>
 <vdmrgc$3rih7$2@dont-email.me> <vdn4kp$3ssv4$9@dont-email.me>
 <vdn4ul$3t78e$3@dont-email.me> <vdn659$3ssv4$18@dont-email.me>
 <vdnrr9$3qrq$1@dont-email.me> <vdnvgh$49ai$1@dont-email.me>
 <vdqe7n$kqq0$1@dont-email.me> <vdqmue$lo51$11@dont-email.me>
 <vds64m$sj9s$1@dont-email.me> <vf2507$9mo4$2@dont-email.me>
 <vf4mbh$qfqu$1@dont-email.me> <vf4pi2$qsfn$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf7but$1blh6$1@dont-email.me> <vf98hi$1lsqn$2@dont-email.me>
 <vfbgtf$25j82$1@dont-email.me> <vfbno9$28v56$3@dont-email.me>
 <vfbqt2$29fb2$1@dont-email.me> <vfcpei$2hhb3$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfhggd$3digo$1@dont-email.me> <vfil4e$3n2b6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfjj4h$3s32a$2@dont-email.me> <vfjngu$3spno$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfk6im$3utgd$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:05:47 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9c888516a38f93e2aadeb3184c27495e";
	logging-data="229245"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+DD7ITggmfu/B+RHWhL0hEE8bbOoBI8H0="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BBEaw2s6cN0VKNS1IBYgiC+YSfg=
Bytes: 2854

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> schrieb:
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 21:38:38 -0000 (UTC), Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> schrieb:
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 11:51:42 -0000 (UTC), Thomas Koenig wrote:
>>>
>>>> The "parameter adjustment" above is explicitly listed as undefined
>>>> behavior, in annex J2 of n2596.pdf (for example):
>>>> 
>>>> "Addition or subtraction of a pointer into, or just beyond, an array
>>>> object and an integer type produces a result that does not point into,
>>>> or just beyond, the same array object (6.5.6)."
>>>
>>> Read it again: note the qualification “that does not point into, or
>>> just beyond, the same array object”. So long as it *does* point “into,
>>> or just beyond, the same array object”, it is fine.
>> 
>> What you are writing is equivalent to
>
> You don’t understand what pointer arithmetic means, do you?

I've killfiled you in comp.arch, and I think it is a good time now
for comp.lang.fortran.