Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Be very, very afraid...
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:34:20 GMT
Message-ID: <vfl1et$1fbc5$1@solani.org>
References: <vfk2bp$3ueps$1@dont-email.me> <vfkkg7$3d2s$1@solani.org> <vfktv9$7486$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:34:21 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="1551749"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (Linux-5.15.32-v7l+)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pzn/y2NUnz1+2/5VfHca72vpipA=
X-Newsreader-location: NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (c) 'LIGHTSPEED' off line news reader for the Linux platform
 NewsFleX homepage: http://www.panteltje.nl/panteltje/newsflex/ and ftp download ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/linux/system/news/readers/ 
X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwDAEBMCVwiOMwzf2H6F3jpDgtfAwX19EZ4y58gkJe3zaqNOKsQ9C/VozB7NZqjbcV5RzDLeK/gNbfxWB
Bytes: 2839
Lines: 40

On a sunny day (Sun, 27 Oct 2024 08:34:49 -0000 (UTC)) it happened Cursitor
Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote in <vfktv9$7486$1@dont-email.me>:

>On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 05:53:10 GMT, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>
>> On a sunny day (Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:43:26 -0700) it happened Don Y
>> <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in <vfk2bp$3ueps$1@dont-email.me>:
>> 
>>>No, not that AI is going to take your job ("render you redundant") but,
>>>rather, that it is going to be relied upon for information that is
>>>provably incorrect:
>>>
>>><https://apnews.com/article/ai-artificial-intelligence-health-
>business-90020cdf5fa16c79ca2e5b6c4c9bbb14>
>>>
>>>it seems the most expeditious way to get these sorts of problems fixed
>>>is NOT to regulate how it can be used but, rather, to hold firms using
>>>it financially (criminally?) accountable for its follies...
>> 
>> Sure, like doctors tha'st make mistakes:
>>  https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/33/2/109
>> 
>> Does them using AI reduce errors?
>> If so they could be accountable for not using it...
>> Like a second opinion, always required?
>> 
>> It is complicated..
>> hacked;-)
>> Power outage...
>> etc etc
>
>Anyone concerned about medical confidentiality should *never* consent to 
>having their records held in digital form anyway. Databases holding such 
>info are prime targets for cyberattacks, as the UK's NHS is quickly 
>finding out.

My medical records are held in digital form and when I moved house I had to give consent for the records
to be made availabe to the local doctor here.
But those digital records only go back a few years.. to when they started with it.
Not much in there.