Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vfmglf$kjh9$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: IR detector system, biasing of photo diode Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 22:59:59 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 103 Message-ID: <vfmglf$kjh9$1@dont-email.me> References: <vfk0u0$3u9en$1@dont-email.me> <ro8rhjdlkrctc6cfv3jfjbuvi8v3r5hl5k@4ax.com> <vflbi0$eevd$3@dont-email.me> <vflcbi$eevd$5@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9b0efae345442cb54f1c494d57a76f2d"; logging-data="675369"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Z/hJ6CyohlHCbitlPYVhA" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z4ev6jcmoBlOXKnHYUghX9Q5v1E= sha1:BWYaefoasOFGwY+pPSu+NE+0LBI= Bytes: 5208 Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote: > On 27-10-2024 13:26, Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund wrote: >> On 27-10-2024 03:26, john larkin wrote: >>> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 02:19:14 +0200, Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund >>> <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I am working on an IR detector that will guide a robot into a docking >>>> station. >>>> >>>> A IR transmitter on the docking station transmits a beam, and 2 IR >>>> detectors on the robot detects the beam and lets the robot navigate >>>> towards the target. The working distance is a couple of meters. >>>> >>>> I need it to be insensitive to ambient light/sunlight. >>>> >>>> The IR detectors are placed in a tube, to narrow in the beam angle and >>>> to avoid sunlight (since it is seldom the sun is actually that low in >>>> the horizon) >>>> >>>> The IR transmitter will be modulated with 10kHz (TBD) frequency, low >>>> duty cycle. Low duty cycle to be able to drive the LED with high >>>> current, frequency modulated so that the receiver can ignore the effect >>>> of daylight (DC) >>>> >>>> If the LED on the docking station has higher radiant intensity at the >>>> point of the robot (2 meters away) than possible IR from sunlight, then >>>> that would be perfect. >>>> >>>> Example of transmitter: >>>> >>>> https://www.vishay.com/docs/83398/vsmy2850.pdf >>>> >>>> Has up to 1000mW/sr. Seems my basic calculation for a 15 degree beam, >>>> shows less than 10nW/m2, while sunlight has 1W/m2. So driving a beam >>>> that has higher output than sunlight seems unlikely. >>>> >>>> I would use a IR phototransistor at 850nm, something like this: >>>> >>>> https://www.ttelectronics.com/TTElectronics/media/ProductFiles/ >>>> Datasheet/OP505-506-535-705.pdf >>>> >>>> Or a photo diode: >>>> >>>> https://docs.rs-online.com/9f58/0900766b816d8a09.pdf >>>> >>>> Fed from reverse 3.3V and into a transimpedance amplifier to boost the >>>> signal with bandpass filter. >>>> >>>> One can get digital IR detector used in a remote control systems: >>>> >>>> https://www.vishay.com/docs/82491/tsop382.pdf >>>> >>>> It has AGC, but digital output. I need analog output to be able to zero >>>> in on the transmitter beam. >>>> >>>> I have been looking for IR detectors that has the analog output, not >>>> just the digital, but have not found any. >>>> >>>> If the photodiode detector is subjected to sunlight, I am guessing I >>>> would need very high gain on the 10kHz modulation frequency to pick up >>>> the burried signal in the DC from sunlight. >>>> >>>> How do I best bias the photo diode for optimum detection of the 10kHz >>>> signal while being immune to the ambient sunlight? >>>> >>>> I have chosen 850nm which seems to be a good wavelength. The spectrum at >>>> sea level has some dips due to water absorption. >>>> >>>> https://sciencetech-inc.com/web/image/49169/ >>>> Spectrum%20with_out%20absorption.png >>>> >>>> Seems like 750nm would be better, since then the IR from the sun is >>>> lower, but does reduced the effective range of the system during >>>> fog/rain. Probably that's why these system do not use 750nm >>>> >>>> Other considerations? >>> >>> You could drive the LED with a square wave, 10 KHz or whatever. The >>> photodiode could have +DC on one end and the other end can hit a >>> parallel LC to ground, resonant at 10K. >>> >>> That takes out the sunlight DC component and adds bandpass filtering. >>> >> >> That's a very nice idea. The Q should not matter much, just as long as >> DC is removed. >> >> The photodiode will still be subjected to the high ambient light, but >> the gain would be close to zero for the stage after. I would then still >> need to be sure the photodiode is never saturated by ambient light. >> > Actually, wont a simple high pass filter work equally well? > > Photo diode with bias -> capacitor to gain block.... > If you make it part of the bias network yes, a gyrator either a single transistor or op amp could take the role of inductor. -- piglet