| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vfp40q$16ufq$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Redundant power supplies Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 22:42:34 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 43 Message-ID: <vfp40q$16ufq$1@dont-email.me> References: <vfko2a$57tm$1@dont-email.me> <vfp2qe$16gfh$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 23:42:34 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="97912288d8dac6215d7ef610e486e9ff"; logging-data="1276410"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CZ+q96cyl0ULEIHkHzXn1" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DqtEhRvIACxujbVpy6UoCwa62vU= sha1:60wxgEQkUHTkl7pHPcvw9KB0mKk= Bytes: 2506 Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> wrote: > On 10/27/24 07:54, Don Y wrote: >> Most of my boxes have dual power supplies.ÿ Most >> don't give me an option as to how they are used/configured; >> one shits the bed, the other is there to cover the load. >> >> I have always *assumed* they were configured to SHARE the load. >> >> I picked up another box that gives me the option of NOT operating >> them redundantly (what the hell does the "extra" one do, just >> sit around??).ÿ And, when in the redundant configuration, >> allows me to choose which is the "primary". >> >> This suggests one is carrying the load and the other is switched >> in (even if passively) when that one fails. >> >> Is there any advantage to this over a "sharing" configuration? > > I would guess if you wanted to power one of them from a "preferred" > powersource and the other from a another source that you don't want > to load unless you have to > > >> >> And, why would I ever want to *disable* PFC? >> > > when you have an UPS that doesn't have sinewave output, they don't > always play nicely with PFC > The two best things about equal sharing are that the supplies run cooler and that you always know that the backup supply is working. Otherwise you risk cascading failures a la Three Mile Island. Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics