Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vfp40q$16ufq$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Redundant power supplies
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 22:42:34 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <vfp40q$16ufq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vfko2a$57tm$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfp2qe$16gfh$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 23:42:34 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="97912288d8dac6215d7ef610e486e9ff";
	logging-data="1276410"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CZ+q96cyl0ULEIHkHzXn1"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DqtEhRvIACxujbVpy6UoCwa62vU=
	sha1:60wxgEQkUHTkl7pHPcvw9KB0mKk=
Bytes: 2506

Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> wrote:
> On 10/27/24 07:54, Don Y wrote:
>> Most of my boxes have dual power supplies.ÿ Most
>> don't give me an option as to how they are used/configured;
>> one shits the bed, the other is there to cover the load.
>> 
>> I have always *assumed* they were configured to SHARE the load.
>> 
>> I picked up another box that gives me the option of NOT operating
>> them redundantly (what the hell does the "extra" one do, just
>> sit around??).ÿ And, when in the redundant configuration,
>> allows me to choose which is the "primary".
>> 
>> This suggests one is carrying the load and the other is switched
>> in (even if passively) when that one fails.
>> 
>> Is there any advantage to this over a "sharing" configuration?
> 
> I would guess if you wanted to power one of them from a "preferred" 
> powersource and the other from a another source that you don't want
> to load unless you have to
> 
> 
>> 
>> And, why would I ever want to *disable* PFC?
>> 
> 
> when you have an UPS that doesn't have sinewave output, they don't 
> always play nicely with PFC
> 

The two best things about equal sharing are that the supplies run cooler
and that you always know that the backup supply is working. 

Otherwise you risk cascading failures a la Three Mile Island. 

Cheers 

Phil Hobbs 

-- 
Dr Philip C D Hobbs  Principal Consultant  ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics  Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics