Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vfp9aa$17qsi$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: IR detector system, biasing of photo diode Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 17:12:54 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <vfp9aa$17qsi$1@dont-email.me> References: <vfk0u0$3u9en$1@dont-email.me> <vfldpv$er7j$2@dont-email.me> <vflj0h$fm8u$1@dont-email.me> <vfm2vo$i9oh$1@dont-email.me> <vfnocj$uluj$3@dont-email.me> <vfnuef$vrlk$1@dont-email.me> <vfp84a$17fj3$6@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 01:12:59 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8f7ceb60878d932608b6ce95e8e41b6d"; logging-data="1305490"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18IouDYJTpulfRJwRsfn7VK" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:ewjRewgi0A9yBZFX2NkZ7+v4zgo= In-Reply-To: <vfp84a$17fj3$6@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2392 On 10/28/2024 4:52 PM, Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund wrote: >> As I said before, it is a really great "sensor"! The downside is >> that you need resources to use it (your optical approach is likely >> possible with far less resources -- think of how robot vaccuum cleaners >> operate wrt their charging docks) > > Correct, all though high resolutionn cameraes are very cheap nowadays. And they > have a Linux maching running the application SW, so adding a camera does not > add much extra cost, just a camera interface IC. But, you need enough MIPS to process the video! As for cameras, you have three options, there: - RS170-ish - USB - Network I prefer the last (though likely most costly) as there is less likelihood of hidden protocol gotchas. I have a (toy?) robot application where the robots are controlled externally based on observations from sensors in their environment. It was considerably easier than equipping the robots with the sensors and processing ability (how do you reliably sense that you are navigating as intended in a given arena?)