Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: The enduring appeal of LibreOffice
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 02:48:50 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <vfpiei$193tj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vfo6rd$11b2k$1@dont-email.me> <vfp8vm$17oqc$2@dont-email.me>
	<vfpf6c$18lrb$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 03:48:50 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="302be35282e4927485ca879f2f683364";
	logging-data="1347507"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8bi+/Mpxw3cjtBqhS299Y"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DhGB2eXvToksCcztVoHyRPmdAbg=
Bytes: 1683

On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:53:17 -0400, DFS wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:07:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 10:24:46 -0400, DFS wrote:
>> 
>>> https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/oct/28/microsoft-excel-spreadsheet-program-40-years
>> 
>> I thought you people believed that the media, particularly Liberal
>> media like The Guardian, were a bunch of liars?
>> 
>> Or are they suddenly credible when they say something you believe in?
> 
> "readers"

Believable, sober, credible readers? Not credulous dupes of Liberal
media? Assuming this publication isn’t lying about what its readers
say in the first place?

Is that really what you believe?