Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a
 new basis ---
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 08:23:04 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <vfqnjo$1iaob$2@dont-email.me>
References: <veoift$29dtl$2@dont-email.me> <veoq3j$2aqp2$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf716u$1607j$1@dont-email.me> <vf7ks8$1d1vt$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf8eu5$1h5mj$2@dont-email.me> <vfdk8g$2lgl1$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfdrb8$2mcdg$1@dont-email.me> <vffk1i$33iat$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfgaev$36im7$5@dont-email.me> <vfi743$3kr1e$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfip3l$3ner2$2@dont-email.me>
 <1bc1ab08ec47bf818ddff1d4f63b542ceadd6985@i2pn2.org>
 <vfjokd$3su2f$1@dont-email.me> <vfk3jl$3kr0c$5@i2pn2.org>
 <vfk4lk$3ukdm$1@dont-email.me> <vfl8o9$3mnmt$5@i2pn2.org>
 <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vflue8$3nvp8$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfmd8m$k2m7$1@dont-email.me>
 <bcd82d9f8a987d3884220c0df7b8f7204cb9de3e@i2pn2.org>
 <vfmueh$mqn9$1@dont-email.me>
 <ff039b922cabbb6d44f90aa71a52d8c2f446b6ab@i2pn2.org>
 <vfo95k$11qs1$1@dont-email.me> <vfp8c0$3tobi$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfpcko$1837o$3@dont-email.me> <vfpish$3u885$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfpjk2$1976k$1@dont-email.me> <vfq79h$3v4c4$6@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:23:05 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="393123f3287a9aeded778d1158c0bfd1";
	logging-data="1649419"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX192ymeyGcYAqw0bz7TbCP7j"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RzCTbzhbTTdoxS+VNPAxP6OFh3w=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241029-2, 10/29/2024), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vfq79h$3v4c4$6@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 3125

On 10/29/2024 3:44 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Mon, 28 Oct 2024 22:08:50 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 10/28/2024 9:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 10/28/24 9:09 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 10/28/2024 6:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It is IMPOSSIBLE to emulate DDD per the x86 semantics without the
>>>>> code for HHH, so it needs to be part of the input.
>>>> At machine address 0000217a HHH emulates itself emulating DDD without
>>>> knowing that it is emulating itself.
>>> Then how did it convert the call HHH into an emulation of DDD again?
>> When HHH (unknowingly) emulates itself emulating DDD this emulated HHH
>> is going to freaking emulate DDD.

> Of course. For that it needs its own code. This doesn't need to be
> marked specially as being itself (HHH is not conscious), it just
> needs to be identical to the running code.
> 
 >

I have provided that at the TOP of page 21 since September 8,10,11
https://www.liarparadox.org/HHH(DDD).pdf

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer