Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vfqsui$1jg6i$2@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vfqsui$1jg6i$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a
 new basis --- TYPO
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:54:10 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <vfqsui$1jg6i$2@dont-email.me>
References: <veoift$29dtl$2@dont-email.me> <veoq3j$2aqp2$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf716u$1607j$1@dont-email.me> <vf7ks8$1d1vt$1@dont-email.me>
 <vf8eu5$1h5mj$2@dont-email.me> <vfdk8g$2lgl1$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfdrb8$2mcdg$1@dont-email.me> <vffk1i$33iat$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfgaev$36im7$5@dont-email.me> <vfi743$3kr1e$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfip3l$3ner2$2@dont-email.me>
 <1bc1ab08ec47bf818ddff1d4f63b542ceadd6985@i2pn2.org>
 <vfjokd$3su2f$1@dont-email.me> <vfk3jl$3kr0c$5@i2pn2.org>
 <vfk4lk$3ukdm$1@dont-email.me> <vfl8o9$3mnmt$5@i2pn2.org>
 <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vflue8$3nvp8$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfmd8m$k2m7$1@dont-email.me>
 <bcd82d9f8a987d3884220c0df7b8f7204cb9de3e@i2pn2.org>
 <vfmueh$mqn9$1@dont-email.me>
 <ff039b922cabbb6d44f90aa71a52d8c2f446b6ab@i2pn2.org>
 <vfo95k$11qs1$1@dont-email.me> <vfp8c0$3tobi$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfpcko$1837o$3@dont-email.me> <vfpish$3u885$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfpjk2$1976k$1@dont-email.me>
 <086fc32f14bcc004466d3128b0fe585b27377399@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:54:11 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="393123f3287a9aeded778d1158c0bfd1";
	logging-data="1687762"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197+rTJd4S4YX/k/CwkT08q"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UjJ1CDBapBBf+vgGgN04nE4Yz0c=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <086fc32f14bcc004466d3128b0fe585b27377399@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241029-2, 10/29/2024), Outbound message
Bytes: 4687

On 10/29/2024 5:50 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 10/28/24 11:08 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 10/28/2024 9:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 10/28/24 9:09 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 10/28/2024 6:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It is IMPOSSIBLE to emulate DDD per the x86 semantics without the 
>>>>> code for HHH, so it needs to be part of the input.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *You seemed to be a totally Jackass here*
>>>> You are not that stupid
>>>> You are not that ignorant
>>>> and this is not your ADD
>>>>
>>>> _DDD()
>>>> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>>>> [0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
>>>> [00002182] 5d         pop ebp
>>>> [00002183] c3         ret
>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>
>>>> At machine address 0000217a HHH emulates itself emulating
>>>> DDD without knowing that it is emulating itself.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Then how did it convert the call HHH into an emulation of DDD again?
>>>
>>
>> When HHH (unknowingly) emulates itself emulating DDD this
>> emulated HHH is going to freaking emulate DDD.
>>
>> Did you think it was going to play poker?
>>
> 
> Which is what it would do, get stuck and fail to be a decider. It might 
> figure out that it is emulating an emulating decider, at which point it 
> knows that the decider might choose to abort its conditional emulation 
> to return, so it needs to emulate further.
> 
> Only by recognizing itself, does it have grounds to say that if I don't 
> abort, it never will, and thus I am stuck, so I need to abort.
> 

Counter-factual. This algorithm has no ability to KNOW ITS OWN CODE.
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c // page 801

*That people fail to agree with this and also fail to*
*correctly point out any error seems to indicate dishonestly*
*or lack of technical competence*

DDD emulated by HHH according to the semantics of the x86
language cannot possibly reach its own "return" instruction
whether or not any HHH ever aborts its emulation of DDD.

I read, reread again and again to make sure that my understanding
is correct. You seems to glance at a few words before spouting off a 
canned rebuttal that does not even apply to my words.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer