Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!jik4.kamens.us!ngp.big-8.org!robomod!not-for-mail
X-NGP-Policy: http://www.big-8.org/~ngp
X-NGP-Info-1: Send submissions to             ngp@ngp.big-8.org
X-NGP-Info-2: Send technical complaints to    ngp-admin@ngp.big-8.org
X-NGP-Info-3: Send complaints about policy to ngp-board@ngp.big-8.org
X-Comment: Moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article.
X-Robomod: STUMP <http://www.algebra.com/~ichudov/stump/>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:18:58 CST
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 jik4.kamens.us 49TIxH1s723522
Delivered-To: news-groups-proposals@moderators.isc.org
Authentication-Results: name/BBB3E5F701; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=9srv.net
From: Anthony <a@9srv.net>
Newsgroups: news.groups.proposals
Subject: Re: Moderator Vacancy Investigation: comp.os.plan9
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <vfrba0$1m5ht$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vfofdq$12trk$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfpdib$18fbv$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfpg24$18ptq$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfpk17$1d58t$1@dont-email.me>
 <3edca21d59de670d5127331386860805$1@octade.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 19:59:13 +0100 (CET)
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:u7gaJiQukQN+zY3DT0cAPWAfEvE=
	sha1:Fl13Wbpz6L1aYc7vKTv5ZYHO72M=
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19cHpg++6Wa26uSRAd+IynWVISJWXc20l4=
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.8 required=5.0
	tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	smtp.eternal-september.org
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1
Approved: NGP Approval Key <ngp-approval-key@ngp.big-8.org>
X-Approval-Mod: tmiller
Lines: 13
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP news.groups.proposals
	iH0EABECAD0WIQSH6so/GGyIEkxgFjWs+RBu6T2F2wUCZyE1Ih8cbmdwLWFwcHJv
	dmFsLWtleUBuZ3AuYmlnLTgub3JnAAoJEKz5EG7pPYXbCVUAnikzSD/dweMZqgty
	AiGRaG+dZZl6AJ9OfIbyfH1qlCE2Rp9CJCM9K5nZWA==
	=RTSW
Bytes: 2907

Byrl Raze Buckbriar <news0@octade.net> wrote:

<snip an interesting proposal>

I think a collective pool of backup moderators would be a great idea. There
are significant organizational challenges to address, mostly born out of
the fact that moderation is decentralized, but it might be worth it. This
is an interesting proposal… But it’s also well outside the scope of this
MVI. :-) 

Back on track, on our mailing list I got one confirmed backup moderator,
and I think I have another interested. I’m now comfortable putting my name
forward as perspective successor moderator.