Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions?
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 00:28:17 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <vfsn6h$207gj$7@dont-email.me>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vfsmqr$207gj$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:28:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="455c24f95a17f59c8fbd0a2a00f2944a";
	logging-data="2104851"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ZeBKeR55DSd+b0miiSVOY9YNEmmRxnKY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/ilg4V8UyXmEQSfMst67U1SmsOY=
In-Reply-To: <vfsmqr$207gj$6@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2110

On 10/30/2024 12:22 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 9/2/2024 10:07 AM, WM wrote:
>> How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit 
>> fractions? The correct answer is: one unit fraction. If you claim more 
>> than one (two or three or infintely many), then these more must be 
>> equal. But different unit fractions are different and not equal to 
>> each other.
>>
>> Another answer is that no unit fraction is lessorequal than all unit 
>> fractions. That means the function NUF(x)
>> Number of UnitFractions between 0 and x > 0
>> with NUF(0) = 0 will never increase but stay at 0. There are no unit 
>> fractions existing at all.
>>
>> Therefore there is only the one correct answer given above.
>>
>> Regards, WM
>>
> 
> You dark numbers need to flow:
> 
> https://youtu.be/fy8kMOqT49M?list=RDGMEMHDXYb1_DDSgDsobPsOFxpA
> 
> lol. Where the heck are they anyway? Ahhh, I forgot. Dark.
> 
> This might be the last time I respond to you WM. It's wearing a little 
> thin.

AP is better.