Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vftjbs$26v6n$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: The joy of actual numbers, was Democracy
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:29:00 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vftjbs$26v6n$2@dont-email.me>
References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks>
 <vfqvjd$1k2j3$4@dont-email.me> <EV9UO.301900$kxD8.194960@fx11.iad>
 <loctfjF6l90U3@mid.individual.net> <tbsUO.96039$afc4.68590@fx42.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:29:01 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f512c0d648b57475ad3d1332958c4c68";
	logging-data="2325719"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+NCxqVgADJohOQOHZNurCVSdxzZ4W71U="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ps6qLhUnPGuvEC5kD/W3Xkzgzxw=
In-Reply-To: <tbsUO.96039$afc4.68590@fx42.iad>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2157

On 30/10/2024 15:23, Scott Alfter wrote:
> In article <loctfjF6l90U3@mid.individual.net>,
> rbowman  <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>> I can never remember if high time preference or low time preference is the
>> one that thinks '$100 today is better than a tomorrow that may never come'
>> but it does seem to be the dominant philosophy.
> 
> That's high time preference.  From
> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167739X21004982:
> 
> "Someone with a high time preference is highly focused on their well-being
> in the present and the immediate future (a 'today person'), whereas
> someone with a low time preference places more emphasis on their well-being
> in the more distant future (a 'tomorrow person')."
> 
Time span of discretion...from the 1960s


-- 
All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that 
all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is 
fully understood.