Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vftjbs$26v6n$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of actual numbers, was Democracy Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:29:00 +0000 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 24 Message-ID: <vftjbs$26v6n$2@dont-email.me> References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks> <vfqvjd$1k2j3$4@dont-email.me> <EV9UO.301900$kxD8.194960@fx11.iad> <loctfjF6l90U3@mid.individual.net> <tbsUO.96039$afc4.68590@fx42.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:29:01 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f512c0d648b57475ad3d1332958c4c68"; logging-data="2325719"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+NCxqVgADJohOQOHZNurCVSdxzZ4W71U=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ps6qLhUnPGuvEC5kD/W3Xkzgzxw= In-Reply-To: <tbsUO.96039$afc4.68590@fx42.iad> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2157 On 30/10/2024 15:23, Scott Alfter wrote: > In article <loctfjF6l90U3@mid.individual.net>, > rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >> I can never remember if high time preference or low time preference is the >> one that thinks '$100 today is better than a tomorrow that may never come' >> but it does seem to be the dominant philosophy. > > That's high time preference. From > https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167739X21004982: > > "Someone with a high time preference is highly focused on their well-being > in the present and the immediate future (a 'today person'), whereas > someone with a low time preference places more emphasis on their well-being > in the more distant future (a 'tomorrow person')." > Time span of discretion...from the 1960s -- All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is fully understood.