Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: jseigh <jseigh_es00@xemaps.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: smrproxy v2
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:39:38 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <vftnga$27k8k$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vequrc$2o7qc$1@dont-email.me> <verr04$2stfq$1@dont-email.me>
 <verubk$2t9bs$1@dont-email.me> <ves78h$2ugvm$2@dont-email.me>
 <vetj1f$39iuv$1@dont-email.me> <vfh4dh$3bnuq$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfh7mg$3c2hs$1@dont-email.me> <vfm4iq$ill4$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfmesn$k6mn$1@dont-email.me> <vfmf21$kavl$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfmm9a$lob3$1@dont-email.me> <vfn2di$r8ca$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfntgb$vete$1@dont-email.me> <vfp1c3$16d9f$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfpd43$186t4$1@dont-email.me> <vfpp18$1dqvu$3@dont-email.me>
 <vfrm7s$1np4q$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:39:39 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a37275ffab632ae3cdb481c13372e4d8";
	logging-data="2347284"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+HjDkIpMH2x8VNtl7azd6o"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bsxliYzOMTX2To69wkOOabnQCj0=
In-Reply-To: <vfrm7s$1np4q$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2170

On 10/29/24 18:05, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 10/28/2024 9:41 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

> 
> Ahhh, if you are using an async membar in your upcoming C++ version, 
> then it would be fine. No problem. A compiler fence ala 
> atomic_signal_fence, and the the explicit release, well, it will work. I 
> don't see why it would not work.
> 
> For some reason, I thought you were going to not use an async membar in 
> your C++ version. Sorry. However, it still would be fun to test 
> against... ;^)

The C version has both versions.  The C++ version does only the
async member version.  But I'm not publishing that code so it's
a moot point.