Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vg05mj$bn6$1@reader1.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!sewer!alphared!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!jik4.kamens.us!ngp.big-8.org!robomod!not-for-mail X-NGP-Policy: http://www.big-8.org/~ngp X-NGP-Info-1: Send submissions to ngp@ngp.big-8.org X-NGP-Info-2: Send technical complaints to ngp-admin@ngp.big-8.org X-NGP-Info-3: Send complaints about policy to ngp-board@ngp.big-8.org X-Comment: Moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article. X-Robomod: STUMP <http://www.algebra.com/~ichudov/stump/> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:54:37 CST DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 jik4.kamens.us 49VEsDsR1535017 Delivered-To: news-groups-proposals@moderators.isc.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mod-relay.zaccari.net E81635FD1F From: Tristan Miller <tmiller@big-8.org> Newsgroups: news.groups.proposals,news.groups Subject: Re: Moderator Vacancy Investigation: comp.os.plan9 Organization: Usenet Big-8 Management Board Message-ID: <vg05mj$bn6$1@reader1.panix.com> References: <vfofdq$12trk$1@dont-email.me> <vfpdib$18fbv$1@dont-email.me> <vfu75k$mv2$1@panix2.panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-CA X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 Approved: NGP Approval Key <ngp-approval-key@ngp.big-8.org> X-Approval-Mod: tmiller Lines: 19 X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP news.groups.proposals iH0EABECAD0WIQSH6so/GGyIEkxgFjWs+RBu6T2F2wUCZyOaLR8cbmdwLWFwcHJv dmFsLWtleUBuZ3AuYmlnLTgub3JnAAoJEKz5EG7pPYXb8b4AniU8Rf/XNrmrRzHs Pn8+FR6q9XanAJ9r+vCAUcw6Ob61Wb2b3Ngle5qELg== =tFNo Bytes: 2344 Greetings. On 2024-10-30 20:16, Scott Dorsey wrote: > Would a complete revote be required in order to make this group > unmoderated? No, that's something the Board could simply ask the ISC to do. We'd just rather not do this as it's possible some servers carrying the group might not pick up on the change in status. A while back we polled news.admin.moderation for comments on how likely a problem this would be, but didn't get much in the way of responses. Regards, Tristan -- Usenet Big-8 Management Board https://www.big-8.org/ board@big-8.org