Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vg05mj$bn6$1@reader1.panix.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!sewer!alphared!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!jik4.kamens.us!ngp.big-8.org!robomod!not-for-mail
X-NGP-Policy: http://www.big-8.org/~ngp
X-NGP-Info-1: Send submissions to             ngp@ngp.big-8.org
X-NGP-Info-2: Send technical complaints to    ngp-admin@ngp.big-8.org
X-NGP-Info-3: Send complaints about policy to ngp-board@ngp.big-8.org
X-Comment: Moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article.
X-Robomod: STUMP <http://www.algebra.com/~ichudov/stump/>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:54:37 CST
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 jik4.kamens.us 49VEsDsR1535017
Delivered-To: news-groups-proposals@moderators.isc.org
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mod-relay.zaccari.net E81635FD1F
From: Tristan Miller <tmiller@big-8.org>
Newsgroups: news.groups.proposals,news.groups
Subject: Re: Moderator Vacancy Investigation: comp.os.plan9
Organization: Usenet Big-8 Management Board
Message-ID: <vg05mj$bn6$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <vfofdq$12trk$1@dont-email.me> <vfpdib$18fbv$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfu75k$mv2$1@panix2.panix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-CA
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1
Approved: NGP Approval Key <ngp-approval-key@ngp.big-8.org>
X-Approval-Mod: tmiller
Lines: 19
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP news.groups.proposals
	iH0EABECAD0WIQSH6so/GGyIEkxgFjWs+RBu6T2F2wUCZyOaLR8cbmdwLWFwcHJv
	dmFsLWtleUBuZ3AuYmlnLTgub3JnAAoJEKz5EG7pPYXb8b4AniU8Rf/XNrmrRzHs
	Pn8+FR6q9XanAJ9r+vCAUcw6Ob61Wb2b3Ngle5qELg==
	=tFNo
Bytes: 2344

Greetings.

On 2024-10-30 20:16, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> Would a complete revote be required in order to make this group
> unmoderated?

No, that's something the Board could simply ask the ISC to do.  We'd 
just rather not do this as it's possible some servers carrying the group 
might not pick up on the change in status.  A while back we polled 
news.admin.moderation for comments on how likely a problem this would 
be, but didn't get much in the way of responses.

Regards,
Tristan

-- 
Usenet Big-8 Management Board
https://www.big-8.org/
board@big-8.org