Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tom Kunich <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: 80th Celebration
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 22:00:35 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 77
Message-ID: <vg0um3$2s822$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vfehnm$2qjue$1@dont-email.me>
	<o83mhjpvm7b9n428gs1vmakhkprfcg9ate@4ax.com>
	<vfg36b$2ossa$1@dont-email.me> <vfgp3n$39uc4$1@dont-email.me>
	<vfmb4l$j4fb$1@dont-email.me> <b6wUO.15974$Vuz4.11561@fx08.iad>
	<vfu3tu$1l8r3$11@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 23:00:36 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="820c89b394650ad8b997e1cf01e9c273";
	logging-data="3022914"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/PqI8DniAExlV6YSWmBuv4S30jxtcRY8M="
User-Agent: Pan/0.146 (Hic habitat felicitas; d7a48b4
 gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:if7n7ahl6/yhnSP0a1djG+Z+bPo=
Bytes: 4769

On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:11:42 -0400, Zen Cycle wrote:

> On 10/30/2024 3:50 PM, cyclintom wrote:
>> On Sun Oct 27 21:25:42 2024 Tom Kunich  wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 11:47:35 -0700, sms wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/25/2024 5:33 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> The question is why was this a surprise? Tommy should realize by now
>>>>> his interpretaion of "reasonable" is quite different from anyone
>>>>> elses.
>>>>> Also, why was it a problem? Is't tommy bringing in $12,000/ month?
>>>>> Why bitch about a $250 dinner bill to celebrate your 80th birth day?
>>>>>
>>>>> Even treating himself to his own birthday, tommy is miserable.
>>>>>
>>>>> so sad.....
>>>>
>>>> The menu is available at:
>>>> https://www.claremont-hotel.com/dine/limewood-bar-restaurant/
>>>>
>>>> $250 is not unreasonable for a fancy restaurant.
>>>>
>>>> I think that we are all aware of Tom's financial situation, and
>>>> spending this much on one meal seems extravagant.
>>>>
>>>> He may want to look into food programs offered by the City of San
>>>> Leandro <https://www.sanleandro.org/1100/Food-Programs>.
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I don't spend extravagantly on restaurants since I want
>>>> to use my retirement money for other purposes. No problem spending
>>>> $40-75 per person occasionally, but $125 per person would not be
>>>> something would feel happy about. Eating at home I spend about $3 per
>>>> day per person and I don't skimp.
>>>
>>> What is it that you think you knolw about my financial situation?
>>> Since I have just given a toital of $60,000 to my brothers as gifts
>>> maybe you ought to listen to Liebermann telling everyone that the car
>>> I bought was for twice what he claimed it was worth according to Kelly
>>> Blue Book. After all there isn't anything that Liebermann doesn't
>>> knoiw about anything and you believe him. Liebermann even told
>>> everyone that there was no water behind the dam at the mouth of Cull
>>> Canyon after I said that it had been replaced with loose mud and he
>>> called that a lie even after I published a picture of a sign saying
>>> "Keep Out - Deep Mud".
>>>
>>> Seems to me that you all hate being part of life's losers, rather than
>>> appreciating what you have. Liebermann has his welfare, Flunky has
>>> employer to happily scew every day, Slocomb is happily a blowhard and
>>> Krygowski who knows nothing about medern bikes can tell us that people
>>> who do own modern bikes should never have a problem with them. But,
>>> those who can, do, and those who can't, teach. And those of us that
>>> became well to do, doing, can laugh in your faces. Your own deep state
>>> has shown you what the think of you by making your retirement pay
>>> worthless.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Steven, that was both mean and uncalled for. Please allow me to
>> appologize. It is difficult to be polite when you're constantly being
>> attacked by the likes of Liebermann, Flunky and Krygowski. It would be
>> fine if these people could actually know much about bicycling but only
>> Flunky has a passing acquaintance with modern bikes and he will scream
>> exactly the opposite from me despite having the experience to know
>> better.
> 
> As soon as you publish something that's right, I'll agree with you.
> FWIW, I agreed with your position on helmets, from both a safety and
> performance perspective.
>> 
>>

You've shown us that you do not have the capacity of knowing anything that 
is right or wrong. You must like being a dumb ass.