| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vg4ql0$3nre2$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: Google Gemini reviews Doctor Who Last of the Time Lords Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 20:16:16 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <vg4ql0$3nre2$1@dont-email.me> References: <vfqtpk$2o80$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <nJgUO.249510$WXO8.215917@fx13.iad> <vfsnd8$22dll$3@dont-email.me> <vfteil$6c6$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vfvfsn$2kbpp$1@dont-email.me> <vg2jh4$38cu9$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 10:16:17 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d90d77c1de2b66357cd349032a6817c6"; logging-data="3927490"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19TS+udzNi0NJZ0NeMnO1ScrWGtwqDn8xk=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.19 Cancel-Lock: sha1:fOe57v+h0mWzDSrDlfTz3X9paPY= In-Reply-To: <vg2jh4$38cu9$3@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2160 Idlehands wrote on 2/11/24 12:02 am: > On 2024-10-31 2:41 a.m., Daniel70 wrote: >> The Doctor wrote on 31/10/24 1:07 am: >>> In article <vfsnd8$22dll$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 >>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>> Dr. WTF wrote on 30/10/2024 1:20 pm: >>>>> On 2024-10-29 9:08 a.m., The Doctor wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Absolutely the best review you have post (cross-posted) so >>>>> far. You should do more like these. >>>>> >>>>> (Cross-posts removed as I am not an arsehole). >>>>> >>>> Yeah!! You would have known Google Gemini would be able to post >>>> such an informative post! ;-P >>> >>> And of course % can deal with Dr.WTF. >> >> And I'm sure Dr WTF is quaking in his boots ..... *NOT* !! > > It's cute how binky admits to being a coward, hiding behind squiggles > skirts. > Yeah, sure, but even Gobble-de-gook should have realised by now that 'squiggle' hardly scares anybody here! ANYBODY!! -- Daniel