Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vg5bqk$3qold$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: 2N=E Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 10:09:17 -0400 Organization: Peripheral Visions Lines: 19 Message-ID: <vg5bqk$3qold$1@dont-email.me> References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <fb930b22-7f79-4a10-858d-a1a9faccc9b9@tha.de> <e2e906ae-48c5-453b-a38f-94c1ebc9ba6b@att.net> <vfgiqa$38oob$1@dont-email.me> <d781add9-cd6b-4fff-9601-111c74f4ae32@att.net> <vfgqa8$39o4h$1@dont-email.me> <a45b5e62-4b8c-4428-83ef-8b9bf62d6981@att.net> <vfj3e9$1e96h$1@solani.org> <40b398d1-40c5-45e9-8615-1cf437af0185@att.net> <vfoqi1$14lcd$6@dont-email.me> <3537899e-e951-4138-b56c-fc76340762b8@att.net> <vftj9t$26ql2$1@dont-email.me> <8b31df46-1361-4dd1-aed3-1f42039af960@att.net> <vfu2qi$29m4j$2@dont-email.me> <84c1bb5d-67db-4d21-918a-f86cd1f815c5@att.net> <vfvefj$9264$2@solani.org> <ca84d22c-3684-4744-a145-a941bac4651f@att.net> <vg0iba$2q8fo$1@dont-email.me> <c2087013-5e5c-4e01-b356-29ffa484bfc2@att.net> <vg0p6j$2ra8e$1@dont-email.me> <485101a8f8a63991b9a375b27310d639c1b71713@i2pn2.org> <vg2akc$36ojq$5@dont-email.me> <ea5b8e8fd08ae108c6a5ea83f448f9eeb889694e@i2pn2.org> <vg4upq$3nd3l$4@dont-email.me> Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 15:09:25 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4637722297925e2b86e06b959c78e846"; logging-data="4022957"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+PbzTw1wcLsYpP1nFJsEQ3oIbMTnRmsus=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:4tc0ZNBzOp3RSt2gsgqQKeXJYBc= X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb X-ICQ: 1701145376 Bytes: 2491 WM formulated on Saturday : > On 02.11.2024 01:55, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 11/1/24 6:30 AM, WM wrote: > >>> If the complete interval is reduced in density then it is enlarged. >>> Complete sets remain of same size. >>> >> Nope. because the "complete interval" has infinite length, and thus >> "density" in the finite sense isn't defined. > > Density does not depend on finiteness. The density of even numbers is half of > the density of integers. Neither of those are dense sets. > When doubling all natnumbers, the result cannot be that numbers are > exorcized. Perhaps not, but the order type could change.