Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: obs-studio, vlc
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 11:46:10 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 80
Message-ID: <vg5hg2$3rm5l$1@dont-email.me>
References: <lo39seFn5f2U2@mid.individual.net>
 <671cf2ae$0$29731$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
 <s2pshj9gegihteh32vnos626rb9hormc8c@4ax.com>
 <671e7962$0$11443$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <vfmu9o$mmkp$3@dont-email.me>
 <vfnvkp$105ek$1@dont-email.me> <vfoa9l$11vad$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfomef$13ggq$1@dont-email.me> <fl30ijpogokkagocce8200tvj93l27ivgc@4ax.com>
 <67252ff7$0$29733$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 16:46:10 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d28cf959e4b7909b9437f9c56fa57a09";
	logging-data="4053173"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ez6CQ/B8EF3caJ61rYDL4/G2ZuhMqp9Q="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rDJaQpKX7aKZ8aHwyTLRpMsmASc=
In-Reply-To: <67252ff7$0$29733$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4573

On 11/1/24 3:45 PM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
> Le 28-10-2024, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> a écrit :
>>>>>> some inferior being wrote:
>>>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There's not one thing wrong with talking about, or insulting, some
>>>>>>>> dumb fsck in your kill file.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's not an explanation, it's a confirmation of your pretended
>>>>>>> "deleted not read" messages.
>>
>> It's no such thing, obviously.
> 
> Thanks for your confirmation you explained nothing.
> 
>> Confirmation that you are a liar.
> 
> If you killfile someone, you don't see his messages. It's not my way of
> seing things, it's the definition of the killfile. So you can't answer
> them. So if you answer a message from someone you killfile, it proves
> you don't killfile him.
> 
>>>>>>> It's a loss of time and it proves
>>>>>>> that the guy you pretend to killfile is way more important to you
>>>>>>> than what you claim.
>>
>> Just the opposite, dumbshit.
> 
> You mean it takes you more time to killfile someone than to read and
> answer his messages?
> 
>> It is my victory when they read me and I don't read them.
> 
> That's a funny one. What do you win exactly? The ultimate winner,
> considering your only point of view, would be someone reading nobody and
> sending a lot of messages. It would be pointless and you would be the
> only one in the world to consider him a winner.
> 
> The purpose of sending messages here, is not only to be read, but to
> exchange. If you don't want exchanges, you create your blog with a one
> side communication. If you killfile someone, it's not a victory, it
> proves you can't exchange with someone. So, it's when reading and
> answering him would be a loss of time, you win time killfiling him.
> 
> When you take some time to answer someone you pretend to killfile, you
> prove him his message is important for you. And when you insult someone
> you killfile, you prove he's important to you because it means you think
> about him when you don't need to. So showing everyone you are pissed of
> with someone proves he infuriates you when he doesn't care about you. So
> it's nothing like a victory.
> 
>> I'm demonstrating my superiority, especially when I commit in advance
>> to letting some inferior being have the last word, unread and
>> unrebutted.
> 
> In fact, as you answer the message, you don't let him have the last
> word. It's exactly the opposite: you want to have the last word at all
> costs even when you have no more argument and are unable to rebute him.
> So you demonstrate the exact opposite of what you pretend and you let
> someone you consider an inferior being win over you. You shouldn't be
> proud of loosing against an inferior being.
> 
>> Nore:  Your response will be deleted, unread.
> 
> Each time you said that, you answered it in a way that proves you read
> it.
> 
>> Note: It's not boastful to be superior to some POS who attacks with
>> lies.
> 
> You are superior to no one. You have never been able to give a logical
> answer. Only stupid sentences. You can't argue, you can only rely on
> mere insults to hide it.
> 

Well said, all throughout.



-hh