Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vg5kmc$he4$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: OT: Programming Languages Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 12:40:43 -0400 Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com) Lines: 80 Message-ID: <vg5kmc$he4$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> References: <vg3575$3bio0$1@dont-email.me> <vg383n$3c25s$1@dont-email.me> <vg3m01$3e15j$2@dont-email.me> <vg4l8t$254k$1@solani.org> <p5ecij1jf5a4in5mnmelkdfrovelr0esko@4ax.com> <vg5ib5$1k47$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <f1kcij51cie8n6c2qdq9fdj7dbm2alsuev@4ax.com> Injection-Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 16:40:44 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com; logging-data="17860"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com" Cancel-Lock: sha1:V8z4vnqWkZb2T8WQj0i8R8mwiSU= sha256:v2HYz3n3urc6ixnZH8cdF+vQYpj4U++jyDPYIJFDITo= sha1:T94Fz6Zv9xN2WWF9/nw8Yqwcl48= sha256:4DygfJPHxJUH7khOYjE4Pa3JWzBIBzz7DmdXiTitgjM= X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 Bytes: 4528 "john larkin" <JL@gct.com> wrote in message news:f1kcij51cie8n6c2qdq9fdj7dbm2alsuev@4ax.com... > On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 12:00:36 -0400, "Edward Rawde" > <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >>"john larkin" <JL@gct.com> wrote in message news:p5ecij1jf5a4in5mnmelkdfrovelr0esko@4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 02 Nov 2024 07:44:28 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On a sunny day (Fri, 1 Nov 2024 22:50:41 -0000 (UTC)) it happened Nick Hayward >>>><nhayward8990@protonmail.com> wrote in <vg3m01$3e15j$2@dont-email.me>: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 19:57:21 +0100, Jeroen Belleman wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 11/1/24 19:04, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>>>>>> You can call me old fashioned, but I still believe there's never been a >>>>>>> more elegant computer language than the original K&R C. You can keep >>>>>>> the rest; I'll stick with that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Agreed! All the hand-holding of later versions just get in the way. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jeroen Belleman >>>>> >>>>>What about C++? >>>> >>>>It is a crime against humanity!!! >>> >>> Most computing languages originate from programmers wanting to play >>> with programming because solving real-world problems - the things we >>> pay them to do - isn't interesting. >>> >>> In academia, they need toys and things to argue about so they keep >>> inventing languages. It's like economists who can't say "let the >>> market work, and econ 101 is all anybody needs." >>> >>> I sat in on one cs class where new languages weren't enough fun, so >>> the prof lectured about compiler compilers, a whole new layer of >>> abstraction. >>> >> >>Ah lex and yacc. >>Well if you're going to use any kind of compiler/interpreter, someone has to write it. >> >>Does LTSpice originate from designers wanting to play with simulation because putting real parts together isn't interesting? > > It's slow and expensive to make ICs, so it makes sense to simulate > first. The ICE in SPICE means "integrated circuit emphasis." There can't be anyone here who doesn't already know that or who hasn't seen that video. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6TrbD7-IwU > > That's brilliant, cultivating your intuition. But I disagree about > using Spice to design real products: it works. > >> >>Managers tend to like simulation because you don't have to get your hands dirty. >>At least not until the design which worked fine in simulation either doesn't work at all or has some unexpected issue in reality. >> >> > > I can run a sim that steps through hundreds or thousands of cases, and > run it over a weekend. A silimar set of breadboard tests might take > months of hands-on bench work. I'm not suggesting you should breadboard everything, that's simply not possible. > > And I was never good at nonlinear control theory. Nobody is. > > I do breadboard to test parts whose models can't be trusted or when > models are unavailable, but we seldom breadboard complex circuits and > never breadboard actual products. > > I know of one giant organization that defines six iterations of a > design, and uses at least that many. It takes them years to finish > anything. >