Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a
 new basis --- EQUIVOCATION
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 11:56:37 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <vg5lk5$3s9mh$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vflue8$3nvp8$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfmd8m$k2m7$1@dont-email.me>
 <bcd82d9f8a987d3884220c0df7b8f7204cb9de3e@i2pn2.org>
 <vfmueh$mqn9$1@dont-email.me>
 <ff039b922cabbb6d44f90aa71a52d8c2f446b6ab@i2pn2.org>
 <vfo95k$11qs1$1@dont-email.me> <vfp8c0$3tobi$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfpcko$1837o$3@dont-email.me> <vfpish$3u885$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfpjk2$1976k$1@dont-email.me>
 <086fc32f14bcc004466d3128b0fe585b27377399@i2pn2.org>
 <vfqsui$1jg6i$2@dont-email.me> <vft4om$44tc$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vft944$25aio$6@dont-email.me>
 <11408789ed30027f4bc9a743f353dfa9b4712109@i2pn2.org>
 <QU2dnTAfup30Rr_6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <vfvnml$2ll12$1@dont-email.me> <vfvujg$2mcse$6@dont-email.me>
 <vg2cqm$37cq6$1@dont-email.me> <vg2kfq$38m0h$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg4va2$3ok87$1@dont-email.me> <vg55lv$3pnvp$1@dont-email.me>
 <38fdfb81e98cbb31d6dfffddbd5a82eff984e496@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 17:56:37 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f24840444c7ed29233b33314df4ac42c";
	logging-data="4073169"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19khIk/8JbB2aq8nUc14JRp"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7P3kBcQ2U8l9QCzQNwkKOF9A8as=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241102-0, 11/1/2024), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <38fdfb81e98cbb31d6dfffddbd5a82eff984e496@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4091

On 11/2/2024 10:44 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/2/24 8:24 AM, olcott wrote:
>>
>> When the main motive of people like Richard is to derail
>> any chance of mutual agreement I cannot proceed with all
>> of the steps achieving mutual agreement on each step one
>> at a time in their mandatory prerequisite order.
> 
> No, my "motive" is to hold cranks to the truth, or at least get them to 
> admit that they are off in some other system, that they can define.
> 
> You keep on wanting to be in the system (since it provides the proof of 
> the things you don't like) but can't hold yourself to actually be in the 
> system.
> 
>>
>> void DDD()
>> {
>>    HHH(DDD);
>>    return;
>> }
>>
>> _DDD()
>> [000020a2] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>> [000020a3] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>> [000020a5] 68a2200000 push 000020a2 ; push DDD
>> [000020aa] e8f3f9ffff call 00001aa2 ; call H0
>> [000020af] 83c404     add esp,+04   ; housekeeping
>> [000020b2] 5d         pop ebp       ; housekeeping
>> [000020b3] c3         ret           ; never gets here
>> Size in bytes:(0018) [000020b3]
>>
>> DDD emulated by HHH according to the semantics of the x86
>> language cannot possibly reach its own "return" instruction
>> whether or not any HHH ever aborts its emulation of DDD.
> 
> Equivocation between looking at the behavor of DDD being the actual 
> program (which include a particular version of HHH) and the behavior of 
> a PARTIAL emulation of DDD by HHH, which ends up not having the property 
> you want to show.
> 
> Partial doesn't lead to showing never.
> 

In other words you continue to perpetually insist on
the ridiculously stupid idea of requiring the complete
emulation of a non-terminating input.

I don't think this is: stupidity, ignorance, ADD.
I don't know what this leaves besides dishonesty with malice.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer