Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vg61ls$3ukov$4@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions? (infinitary)
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 13:22:19 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <vg61ls$3ukov$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org>
 <acd4aad3-9447-45a9-bafd-f8b93d781827@att.net> <vfj3v0$1e96h$2@solani.org>
 <vfjg9h$3rjvp$2@dont-email.me> <vfkqlr$3fii$1@solani.org>
 <vflgnb$fblp$1@dont-email.me> <vflop8$1fpr2$2@solani.org>
 <e7920520807a00a070c701d5953e4416ce0dfd66@i2pn2.org>
 <vfnpf2$ukv3$1@dont-email.me> <vfns3j$3r5kq$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfoq1m$14lcd$4@dont-email.me> <vfp9q0$3tqss$3@i2pn2.org>
 <vfq750$1fqil$2@dont-email.me> <vfqfpk$3vms5$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vftjuj$26ql1$2@dont-email.me>
 <30dffbdf129483f7b61e3284d1e7bf2ad2e5ea16@i2pn2.org>
 <vg0f4f$2p50e$2@dont-email.me>
 <9ca97f4a24ae1e3041583265125cf860d2fada11@i2pn2.org>
 <vg2bfl$375p7$1@dont-email.me> <vg2c64$3799e$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg2eju$37aml$1@dont-email.me> <vg2hr4$388sl$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg31kv$3av1t$1@dont-email.me> <vg37a2$3c03d$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg3cd7$3cnhr$1@dont-email.me> <vg3il2$3dueg$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg4t58$3nd3l$2@dont-email.me> <vg5avi$3qjkj$1@dont-email.me>
 <ELqdndl4Qvrg9Lv6nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 21:22:21 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6e8fcc6cbd8587a7e26447d4479abcfd";
	logging-data="4150047"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/WXA3RxB81gqTkOM4f8Bx1EDaIpdxRwLs="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FuBXoQkYqN6tcVB6aHrnDlxDybQ=
In-Reply-To: <ELqdndl4Qvrg9Lv6nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4257

On 11/2/2024 11:03 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 11/02/2024 06:54 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> WM was thinking very hard :
>>> On 01.11.2024 22:53, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>> WM explained on 11/1/2024 :
>>>>> On 01.11.2024 19:39, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>>>> WM formulated the question :
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Infinite subsets don't do that for you, even if you wish really
>>>>>>>> hard.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They cannot evade if they are invariable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sets don't change.
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore the elements do not depend on us and our knowledge. "If I
>>>>> find x, then I can find x + 1" is not relevant. "For every x (that I
>>>>> find) there is x + 1" is no relevant. All elements are there,
>>>>> independent of what we know or do. Therefore the first and the last
>>>>> are also there independent of us. If they weren't, their existence
>>>>> would depend on some circumstances and could change.
>>>>
>>>> Circumstances like "there is no last element"?
>>>
>>> That means, there is always another element. Potential infinity.
>>
>> Sets don't change. Forget about amplifying 'not finite' with such as
>> 'actual' and potential' -- infinite simply means not finite and
>> 'actual/potential' is a distinction without a difference. A useless
>> concept outside of math philosophy.
>>
>>>> the set of denominators have no largest element to 'start' with.
>>>
>>> If all unit fractions are existing, then a smallest unit fraction is
>>> existing. If NUF(x) has grown to ℵ₀ at x₀, then ℵ₀ unit fractions must
>>> be between 0 and x₀. Hence at least ℵ₀ points with ℵ₀ intervals of
>>> uncountably many points must be between 0 and x₀. That cannot happen
>>> at x₀ = 0.
>>>
>>> Is that too hard to understand?
>>
>> Apparently, for you.
> 
> Au contraire, there are multiple law(s) of large numbers,

What about this sucker (42^999429994299942) * 2 ?

Oh, don't forget about ((42^999429994299942) * 2) + 1   damn it!



> and in mathematics like emergence after convergence,
> the potential / practical / effective / actual distinction,
> of "infinity", is a thing.
> 
> You know who discovered mathematics? Philosophers.
> 
>