Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vg7h6h$a5b6$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Programming Languages
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:53:19 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 72
Message-ID: <vg7h6h$a5b6$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vg3575$3bio0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg3tkh$1kht$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <vg4fff$3lok1$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg5m8l$21fg$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <ahucij5dt50fihbuenl766e80isr227gqa@4ax.com> <vg6n2g$295s$3@dont-email.me>
 <3keeijpbd762i795grvcaohlbf4c4j03j9@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 10:53:22 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f48fba85c9bfbf253fad93eba184ff84";
	logging-data="333158"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19aET3Fhnn8k8chVD+lO/aG+eLYLuEKt04="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CiGmhj4NS6c818LkV/3b8cC2gPc=
In-Reply-To: <3keeijpbd762i795grvcaohlbf4c4j03j9@4ax.com>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241102-0, 2/11/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4658

On 3/11/2024 7:56 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:27:26 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/11/2024 6:21 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 13:07:32 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vg4fff$3lok1$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>> On 2/11/2024 12:01 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:
>>>>>> "Cursitor Doom" <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote in message news:vg3575$3bio0$1@dont-email.me...

<snip>

>>>>> You've also got the point that when there's a voltage drop across the FET channel, it adds to the gate-to-channel voltage (as has
>>>>> been mentioned here) and you can cancel that with an in-phase fundamental component
>>>>
>>>> The last circuit of my own had both an n fet and a p fet.
>>>> I found that by adding a capacitor from one gate to the other (to try to cancel the unwanted signals in opposite phase) I could get
>>>> the unwanted gate signal below 100uV. I then had harmonics approaching 60dB down except one at 50dB (I think 2KHz). Not brilliant
>>>> but not bad.
>>>>
>>>> There are some useful pointers here:
>>>> https://sound-au.com/articles/sinewave.htm
>>>> In particular where it says "Done properly, a JFET can provide distortion performance that is as good or better than a lamp or
>>>> thermistor."
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps I'll concentrate on how to make the FET behave as a voltage variable resistor over the widest possible range.
>>>>
>>>> I also what to look into what I meant by crud and non crud mode in LTSpice.

>>>> This mysterious effect can depend on things such as which specific computer is used and how long is specified before collecting
>>>> simulation data.

John May made the point that in LTSpice trapezium integration (as 
opposed to modified trapezium integration) give less distortion in the 
simulated waveform. Numerical integration is a good way of accumulating 
rounding error, and shorter words mean more rounding error.

>>>> You can see it in the gate voltage after startup. It looks a bit like a PLL hunting and eventually locking but it doesn't happen at
>>>> startup, it happens after seconds.

Closed loop feedback takes a while to settle. If you known what you are 
doing you can mostly make the settling dead-beat, but sometimes this 
costs you more performance that you can afford.

>>>> So I'll need to be able to post some pictures to show that. I'll get to that.

<snipped Cursitor Doom being an ass>

>> Of course it is.That's why Wein bridges need a non-linear element that
>> can be adjust to get the gain exactly right and keep it there.
> 
> Not necessarily. You could have a linear component set up in such a
> way that it performs non-linearly.

Then it stops being a linear component.

>>>> Is there an easy way to remove a DC offset from a simulation trace so that my n and p gate signals can be superimposed after
>>>> startup?
>>
>> There is but Cursitor Doom doesn't know it.
> 
> Yeah, still haven't heard of capacitors.

Non sequitur. The simulation program involved - LTSpice - does 
accommodate capacitors, but you don't need to add them to the circuit 
being simulated to do what Edward Rawde was asking for.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney