| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vg7h6h$a5b6$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Programming Languages Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:53:19 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 72 Message-ID: <vg7h6h$a5b6$2@dont-email.me> References: <vg3575$3bio0$1@dont-email.me> <vg3tkh$1kht$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vg4fff$3lok1$1@dont-email.me> <vg5m8l$21fg$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <ahucij5dt50fihbuenl766e80isr227gqa@4ax.com> <vg6n2g$295s$3@dont-email.me> <3keeijpbd762i795grvcaohlbf4c4j03j9@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 10:53:22 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f48fba85c9bfbf253fad93eba184ff84"; logging-data="333158"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19aET3Fhnn8k8chVD+lO/aG+eLYLuEKt04=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:CiGmhj4NS6c818LkV/3b8cC2gPc= In-Reply-To: <3keeijpbd762i795grvcaohlbf4c4j03j9@4ax.com> X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241102-0, 2/11/2024), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4658 On 3/11/2024 7:56 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote: > On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 13:27:26 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> > wrote: > >> On 3/11/2024 6:21 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>> On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 13:07:32 -0400, "Edward Rawde" >>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> "Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vg4fff$3lok1$1@dont-email.me... >>>>> On 2/11/2024 12:01 pm, Edward Rawde wrote: >>>>>> "Cursitor Doom" <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote in message news:vg3575$3bio0$1@dont-email.me... <snip> >>>>> You've also got the point that when there's a voltage drop across the FET channel, it adds to the gate-to-channel voltage (as has >>>>> been mentioned here) and you can cancel that with an in-phase fundamental component >>>> >>>> The last circuit of my own had both an n fet and a p fet. >>>> I found that by adding a capacitor from one gate to the other (to try to cancel the unwanted signals in opposite phase) I could get >>>> the unwanted gate signal below 100uV. I then had harmonics approaching 60dB down except one at 50dB (I think 2KHz). Not brilliant >>>> but not bad. >>>> >>>> There are some useful pointers here: >>>> https://sound-au.com/articles/sinewave.htm >>>> In particular where it says "Done properly, a JFET can provide distortion performance that is as good or better than a lamp or >>>> thermistor." >>>> >>>> Perhaps I'll concentrate on how to make the FET behave as a voltage variable resistor over the widest possible range. >>>> >>>> I also what to look into what I meant by crud and non crud mode in LTSpice. >>>> This mysterious effect can depend on things such as which specific computer is used and how long is specified before collecting >>>> simulation data. John May made the point that in LTSpice trapezium integration (as opposed to modified trapezium integration) give less distortion in the simulated waveform. Numerical integration is a good way of accumulating rounding error, and shorter words mean more rounding error. >>>> You can see it in the gate voltage after startup. It looks a bit like a PLL hunting and eventually locking but it doesn't happen at >>>> startup, it happens after seconds. Closed loop feedback takes a while to settle. If you known what you are doing you can mostly make the settling dead-beat, but sometimes this costs you more performance that you can afford. >>>> So I'll need to be able to post some pictures to show that. I'll get to that. <snipped Cursitor Doom being an ass> >> Of course it is.That's why Wein bridges need a non-linear element that >> can be adjust to get the gain exactly right and keep it there. > > Not necessarily. You could have a linear component set up in such a > way that it performs non-linearly. Then it stops being a linear component. >>>> Is there an easy way to remove a DC offset from a simulation trace so that my n and p gate signals can be superimposed after >>>> startup? >> >> There is but Cursitor Doom doesn't know it. > > Yeah, still haven't heard of capacitors. Non sequitur. The simulation program involved - LTSpice - does accommodate capacitors, but you don't need to add them to the circuit being simulated to do what Edward Rawde was asking for. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney