Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vg844n$dri5$2@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vg844n$dri5$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a
 new basis --- EQUIVOCATION
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 09:16:39 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <vg844n$dri5$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vfpjk2$1976k$1@dont-email.me>
 <086fc32f14bcc004466d3128b0fe585b27377399@i2pn2.org>
 <vfqsui$1jg6i$2@dont-email.me> <vft4om$44tc$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vft944$25aio$6@dont-email.me>
 <11408789ed30027f4bc9a743f353dfa9b4712109@i2pn2.org>
 <QU2dnTAfup30Rr_6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <vfvnml$2ll12$1@dont-email.me> <vfvujg$2mcse$6@dont-email.me>
 <vg2cqm$37cq6$1@dont-email.me> <vg2kfq$38m0h$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg4va2$3ok87$1@dont-email.me> <vg55lv$3pnvp$1@dont-email.me>
 <38fdfb81e98cbb31d6dfffddbd5a82eff984e496@i2pn2.org>
 <vg5lk5$3s9mh$1@dont-email.me>
 <ba125243c8b842c626957957dadff9e89c84a873@i2pn2.org>
 <vg64mh$3v3m7$1@dont-email.me>
 <750be82de0bb525580577c5ed9ce33a04ad369be@i2pn2.org>
 <vg6glu$1ejv$1@dont-email.me>
 <0a36b538765fd0281b7bfe7e289854d8e8759067@i2pn2.org>
 <vg6hv7$1mc6$1@dont-email.me>
 <9211b826f7b6e9a33e330b1fb665497b257270cf@i2pn2.org>
 <vg6jtk$1uqc$1@dont-email.me>
 <0c832418f6eb4f2894105bf227b91d3f9feff5e4@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 16:16:40 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="78d696b0e880e7e96a4aa9625f760657";
	logging-data="454213"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19KN/xaQGkpjfN/z8+0hY0X"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+sEXVy0I03R604RlYwK/dnrfTog=
In-Reply-To: <0c832418f6eb4f2894105bf227b91d3f9feff5e4@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241102-0, 11/1/2024), Outbound message
Bytes: 4364

On 11/3/2024 8:32 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Sat, 02 Nov 2024 20:33:40 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 11/2/2024 8:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 11/2/24 9:00 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 11/2/2024 7:52 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 11/2/24 8:38 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/2/2024 7:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/2/24 5:13 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/2/2024 3:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 11/2/24 12:56 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/2/2024 10:44 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/2/24 8:24 AM, olcott wrote:
> 
>>>>>>>>> Of course, that is for this exact input, which uses the copy of H
>>>>>>>>> that does abort and return.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No it is not.
>>>>>>>>     when HHH simulates DDD(), it's analyzing an "idealized"
>>>>>>>>     version of DDD() where nothing stops the recursion.
>>>>>>> In other words you are admitting that it isn't actually looking at
>>>>>>> the input it was given.
>>>>>> ChatGPT (using its own words) and I both agree that HHH is supposed
>>>>>> to predict the behavior of the infinite emulation on the basis of
>>>>>> its finite emulation.
> LLMs literally string words they have previously seen together.
> 
>>>>> Yes, but that behavior is DEFINED by the actual behavior of the
>>>>> actual machine.
>>>> No it is not. It is never based on the actual behavior of the actual
>>>> machine for any non-terminating inputs.
> Haha what? It absolutely is. For a nonterminating input a halting
> decider must return that it doesn't halt.
> 
>>> Then you don't undetstand the requirement for something to be a
>>> semantic property.
>> The actual behavior specified by the finite string input to HHH does
>> include HHH emulating itself emulating DDD such that this DD *not some
>> other DDD somewhere else*
> Especially not some DDD that calls a non-aborting simulator HHH1.

*HHH1 has identical source code to HHH*

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}

DDD emulated by HHH
CANNOT POSSIBLY reach its own return instruction.

DDD emulated by HHH1
DOES REACH its own return instruction.



-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer