Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vg8g2v$fg4n$3@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vg8g2v$fg4n$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a
 new basis ---
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:40:31 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <vg8g2v$fg4n$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me>
 <bcd82d9f8a987d3884220c0df7b8f7204cb9de3e@i2pn2.org>
 <vfmueh$mqn9$1@dont-email.me>
 <ff039b922cabbb6d44f90aa71a52d8c2f446b6ab@i2pn2.org>
 <vfo95k$11qs1$1@dont-email.me> <vfp8c0$3tobi$2@i2pn2.org>
 <vfpbtq$1837o$2@dont-email.me> <vfq4h9$1fo1n$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfqpi3$1iaob$4@dont-email.me> <vfqsng$1gikg$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfsadf$1urkc$1@dont-email.me> <vft4kp$23a0h$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfvo2o$2ln20$1@dont-email.me> <vg09p2$2kq69$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg0a9h$2op6r$1@dont-email.me>
 <fd8bf90393a5bcb10f7913da9081421637262590@i2pn2.org>
 <vg14nd$2t4b1$1@dont-email.me> <SGUUO.312650$kxD8.126005@fx11.iad>
 <vg16dl$2th77$1@dont-email.me> <vg2b6j$374jn$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg2gg1$37lpn$5@dont-email.me> <vg4onc$3ngof$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg4uem$3o3ca$1@dont-email.me> <vg7f7l$a1jf$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg7t8h$c823$4@dont-email.me>
 <psydnYHRoboAJbr6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <vg8djc$fg4n$1@dont-email.me>
 <6d8148432a7183c5f16c2f5b3b549fb6b3edc390@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 19:40:32 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="78d696b0e880e7e96a4aa9625f760657";
	logging-data="508055"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/NqeZdGIyQXfFG2kXz5WTo"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xaCk3kJYxe5ZYLPJzvxrwUpGKyo=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <6d8148432a7183c5f16c2f5b3b549fb6b3edc390@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241102-0, 11/1/2024), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4604

On 11/3/2024 12:22 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/3/24 12:58 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 11/3/2024 11:53 AM, Mike Terry wrote:
>>> On 03/11/2024 13:19, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 11/3/2024 3:19 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-11-02 10:21:09 +0000, Andy Walker said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 02/11/2024 08:43, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>> A false assertion is a lie even if nobody asserts it.
>>>>>> [PO:]
>>>>>>>> Not at all. The base meaning of {lie} requires intentional
>>>>>>>> deception.
>>>>>>> That may be its base meaning but the full meaning includes
>>>>>>> all false statements. The statement itself does not change
>>>>>>> when someone states it so there is no clear advantage in
>>>>>>> saying that the statement was not a lie until someone stated
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Disagree.  There is a clear advantage in distinguishing those
>>>>>> who make [honest] mistakes from those who wilfully mislead.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is not a disagreement.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The term "lie" is to only be applied to intentionally
>>>> deceitful statements. To apply the term "lie" to statements
>>>> not having intentional deceit <is> itself intentional deceit.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not if the person making that claim sincerely believes it. :)  You 
>>> are being inconsistent here...
>>
>> Richard has said that he does not mean intentional
>> deceit when he calls me a liar, yet uses the term
>> "liar" anyway knowing that others will take this
>> to mean intentional deceit. So Richard is a liar
>> for calling me a liar.
>>
> 
> Because the word doesn't just mean intential deciet.
> 
> And you are an intentional liar to say it only means that, as you have 
> been shown the definition.
> 

Unless you always qualify you use of the term "liar" as
{unintentional falsity} it is the kind of defamation suit
that you will lose because the communication process always
assumes the primary meaning of a term unless otherwise specified.

You can't even correctly say that my statements are false.
The most that you can accurately say is that my statements
are inconsistent with conventional opinions.

> IF you won't accept the truth, then you become the classical case of the 
> pathological liar that lies because he can not tell the difference 
> between truth and lies, and speaks with a reckless disreguard for the 
> truth.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer