Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:55:35 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <vgaua6$11df5$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <vga5mb$st52$1@dont-email.me>
 <vga7qi$talf$1@dont-email.me> <03b90d6c-fff1-411d-9dec-1c5cc7058480@tha.de>
 <380a63a4ba5e4206504c27b06c9f2a4b6bf3c02d@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 17:55:34 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="499bee167da49173d367555ed141e202";
	logging-data="1095141"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197BXhyZL0NoCaWRHosLypNOUTLlfFFACQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lyr6W9/3kNYNcsdY9xV3AQUHUEE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <380a63a4ba5e4206504c27b06c9f2a4b6bf3c02d@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 1899

On 04.11.2024 13:28, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/4/24 5:47 AM, WM wrote:

>> I said the nearest one. There is no interval nearer than the nearest one.
> 
> Unless "nearest" isn't a thing because things are dense.

The intervals cannot be dense because they have a length of less than 3 
in an infinite space. The rationals are dense. This proves that they are 
not countable.>>
>>> Therefore the
>>> point has no nearest interval.
>>
>> That is an unfounded assertions and therefore not accepted.
> 
> No, it is a PROVEN statement, therefor true.

It is proven in an inconsistent theory. I describe the true mathematics.

Regards, WM