Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vgb0ep$11df5$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:32:10 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 40 Message-ID: <vgb0ep$11df5$4@dont-email.me> References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <vgab11$st52$3@dont-email.me> <ecffc7c0-05a2-42df-bf4c-8ae3c2f809d6@att.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 18:32:10 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="499bee167da49173d367555ed141e202"; logging-data="1095141"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+XGpfjHk7k8GzBnvmPejElmXZ+YLfys5E=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:eQ3/MWTN57ua9oxZTMr3cbhxZzQ= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <ecffc7c0-05a2-42df-bf4c-8ae3c2f809d6@att.net> Bytes: 2327 On 04.11.2024 15:37, Jim Burns wrote: > On 11/4/2024 6:26 AM, WM wrote: >> On 03.11.2024 23:18, Jim Burns wrote: >>> On 11/3/2024 3:38 AM, WM wrote: > >>>> Further there are never >>>> two irrational numbers >>>> without a rational number between them. > >>>> (Even the existence of neighbouring intervals >>>> is problematic.) >>> >>> There aren't any neighboring intervals. >>> Any two intervals have intervals between them. >> >> That is wrong in geometry. >> The measure outside of the intervals is infinite. >> Hence there exists at least one point outside. >> This point has two nearest intervals > > This point, > which is on the boundary of two intervals, > is not two irrational points. You are wrong. The intervals together cover a length of less than 3. The whole length is infinite. Therefore there is plenty of space for a point not in contact with any interval. > > Further there are never > two irrational numbers > without an interval between them. Not in reality. But in the used model. The rationals are dense but the intervals are not. This proves that the rationals are not countable. Regards, WM > >