Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vgb1fj$128tl$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:49:39 +0200
Organization: -
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <vgb1fj$128tl$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <vga5mb$st52$1@dont-email.me> <vga7qi$talf$1@dont-email.me> <03b90d6c-fff1-411d-9dec-1c5cc7058480@tha.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 18:49:40 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8245a8df2d0675697893dca8aaf7adb2";
	logging-data="1123253"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+BRiN+Bem6BcGprmRELGlZ"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5/CcE9EBNWzcRTGobh4QBkLtclg=
Bytes: 2066

On 2024-11-04 10:47:19 +0000, WM said:

> On 04.11.2024 11:31, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-11-04 09:55:24 +0000, WM said:
>> 
>>> On 03.11.2024 23:18, Jim Burns wrote:
>>> 
>>>> There aren't any neighboring intervals.
>>>> Any two intervals have intervals between them.
>>> 
>>> That is wrong. The measure outside of the intervals is infinite. Hence 
>>> there exists a point outside. This point has two nearest intervals
>> 
>> No, it hasn't.
> 
> In geometry it has.

This discussion is about numbers, not geometry.

>> Between that point an an interval there are rational
>> numbers and therefore other intervals
> 
> I said the nearest one. There is no interval nearer than the nearest one.

There is no nearesst one. There is always a nearer one.

>> Therefore the
>> point has no nearest interval.
> 
> That is an unfounded assertions and therefore not accepted.

It is not unfounded. Your conterclaim is unfounded (or at least its
foundation is not in anythhing relevant).

-- 
Mikko