Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: "Performance king"
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:24:05 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <vgb3g3$10e0f$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vgb0hp$122je$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 19:24:04 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5232360b51ad151d3e639476c70a970f";
	logging-data="1062927"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/FAR2LmF482aWsJgHz/E/u+7B1Yoyx2sI="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iOL004a+zc+FOXjhT8Ab6ja/GCM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vgb0hp$122je$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2008

On 11/4/2024 12:33 PM, Alan wrote:
> 'Apple's M4 Max is the single-core performance king in Geekbench 6 — M4 
> Max beats the Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen 9 9950X
> 
> All that power is in a small package.'
> 
> <https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/apples-m4-max-is-the-single-core-performance-king-in-geekbench-6-m4-max-beats-the-core-ultra-9-285k-and-ryzen-9-9950x>
> 
> 'On the x86 end, AMD and Intel pale in contrast. The M4 Max handily 
> keeps up even in multi-core at a fraction of the power—beating Intel's 
> Core Ultra 9 285K by around 19% in the single-core category and 16% in 
> the multi-core category. Compared to the Ryzen 9 9950X, the M4 Max 
> showed 18% higher single-core performance and 25% higher multi-core 
> performance.'
> 
> But there are those who believe that Apple is terrible at chip design.
> 
> :-)

Could Apple be a reason Nvidia CPU tech may kill off Intel's laptop CICS 
CPU line.